细胞角蛋白19、galectin-3、HBME-1在甲状腺病变上的表达及鉴别诊断意义

目的 研究细胞角蛋白(CK)19、galectin(Gal)-3、HBME-1在甲状腺不同病变表达的特点及鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法 应用免疫组织化学EnVision法检测了21例结节性甲状腺肿(结甲)、14例毒性甲状腺肿(甲亢)、15例甲状腺滤泡性腺瘤(腺瘤)、13例滤泡性癌、13例滤泡型乳头状癌及48例经典型乳头状癌中单克隆抗体CK19、Gal-3、HBME-1的表达。结果 甲状腺病变中3种标记表达均位于细胞质;CK19、Gal-3、HBME-1的表达在甲状腺良性病变(结甲、甲亢、腺瘤)大多为弱阳性或阴性,而滤泡性癌阳性明显增加、乳头状癌(滤泡型及经典型)大多为中、强阳性,3种标记在甲状腺不同病变的阳性表达率结甲为52．4％(11／21)、9．5％(2／21)、19．0％(4／21),甲亢为50．0％(7／14)、7．1％(1／14)、7．1％(1／14),腺瘤为60％(9／15)、13．3％(2／15)、13．3％(2／15),滤泡性癌为76．9％(10／13)、61．5％(8／13)、53．8％(7／13),滤泡型乳头状癌为：100％(13／13)、84．6％(11／13)、92．3％(12／13),经典型乳头状癌为100％(48／48)、93．8％(45／48)、95．8％(46／48);在甲状腺良性病变(结甲、甲亢、腺瘤)与恶性病变(滤泡性癌、乳头状癌)间3种标记差异均有显著性(P均=0．000);同时3种标记在滤泡样病变即腺瘤、滤泡性癌和滤泡型乳头状癌间亦有显著差异(CK19：P=0．038,Gal-3：P=0．001,HBME-1：P=0．000)。结甲有9例,甲亢有7例,腺瘤有6例3种标记均不表达,滤泡性癌仅有1例,而乳头状癌(滤泡型及经典型)没有病例3种标记均不表达,同一病例有2种以上阳性表达在结甲、甲亢、腺瘤、滤泡性癌、滤泡型乳头状癌和经典型乳头状癌中分别为14．2％(3／21)、21．4％(3／14)、20．0％(3／15)、69．2％(9／13)、92．3％(12／13)、100．0%(48／48),在甲状腺良性病变与恶性病变间以及滤泡样病变间差异亦有显著性(P=0．000)。结论 CK19、Gal-3、HBME-1的检测尤其是联合检测对甲状腺病变的诊断、鉴别诊断具有较高的实用价值。

Expression of cytokeratin19, galectin-3 and HBME-1 in thyroid lesions and their differential diagnoses

Objective To study immunohistochemical expression of cytokeratin19 (CK19), galectin-3(Gal-3) and HBME-1 in thyroid lesions and to assess their usefulness as markers in the differential diagnoses of thyroid nodular lesions. Methods Immunohistochemical staining was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue of 21 cases of nodular goiters, 14 cases of toxic goiters, 15 cases of follicular adenomas (FA), 13 cases of follicular carcinomas (FC), 13 cases of follicular variant papillary carcinomas (FVPC) and 48 cases of classic papillary carcinomas (CPC). Results All three markers were expressed in the cytoplasm with no or weak expression in benign lesions and diffuse and strong in malignant cases. Positive expressions of CK19,Gal-3 and HBME-1 were present in 11of 21,two of 21,four of 21 in nodular goiters, seven of 14,one of 14,one of 14 in toxic goiters, nine of 15,two of 15,two of 15 in FA,10 of 13,eight of 13, seven of 13 in FC,13 of 13,11 of 13, 12 of 13 in FVPC, and 48 of 48, 45 of 48, 46 of 48 in CPC. The expression rates of the three markers between benign lesions (nodular goiters, toxic goiters and FA) and malignant lesions (FA, FVPC and CPC) were statistically significant. Among the three follicular lesions (FA,FC and FVPC), the differences were statistically significant as well. Nine, seven and six cases were negative for all three markers in nodular goiters, toxic goiters and FA, respectively. Only one case in FC was negative for all three markers, no case was all negative in FVPC and CPC; the rate of one case with two or more positive marker expression in nodular goiters, toxic goiters, FA,FC,FVPC and PC was 14.2%(3/21), 21.43%(3/14), 20.0%(3/15), 69.2%(9/13), 92.3%(12/13), 100.0%(48/48),the differences between benign lesions and malignant lesions and between FA,FC and FVPC were also statistically significant. Conclusions Immunohistochemical stains of CK19, Gal-3 and HBME-1, especially when used in combination, can be an important adjunct to the histopathological diagnoses of thyroid lesions.