首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of aortic valve area in 100 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: Comparison of cardiac computed tomography with ECHO (transesophageal/transthoracic) and catheter examination
Institution:1. Department of Cardiology, Division of Medicine, Klinikum Calw-Nagold, Kliniken Calw, Germany;2. Department of Cardiology, Division of Medicine II, Klinikum Bayreuth, Germany;3. Department of Cardiology, Division of Medicine III, University of Tübingen, Germany
Abstract:BackgroundCurrent guidelines place emphasis on the determination of aortic valve area (AVA) for defining an appropriate treatment strategy. Invasive and non-invasive modalities are used to perform planimetric transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and cardiac multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)] and calculated catheter examination (CE), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)] AVA measurements.Purpose and methodsWe investigated 100 patients admitted to evaluate the AVA using cardiac MDCT (CT), TEE/TTE as well as invasive CE.ResultsIn all 100 patients we calculated a mean AVA of 0.79 ± 0.29 cm2 (female 50/100, 0.70 ± 0.19 cm2, male 0.9 ± 0.21 cm2) determined by all investigated examinations (mean ± SEM). AVA measurements determined by CT were significantly greater (0.86 ± 0.25 cm2) than those determined by CE: 0.75 ± 0.18 cm2, p = 0.01. Echocardiographically determined AVA was comparable to CE (statistically not significant). Similar results were seen in all patients regardless of gender, presence of atrial fibrillation, and heart rate. We calculated a mean AVA for each patient and evaluated the variance of the AVA determined through investigated specific examinations as the bias. Overall, we found for CT 0.13 ± 0.1 cm2, CE 0.13 ± 0.11 cm2, TEE 0.16 ± 0.09 cm2, and for TTE 0.16 ± 0.08 cm2 a specific statistical non-significant variance. On subgroups: sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, females, males or combination, we found no further significant relevance for the specific variance.ConclusionOur data suggest the feasibility of cardiac MDCT to evaluate the correct AVA regardless of rhythm, heart rate, and sex. The planimetric concept to determine the AVA with CT displaces the “gold-standard” CE with respect to elucidating the potencies for complications, i.e. cerebral stroke. Regardless of CT's accessing of AVA measurement the TTE examination should remain the primary method of screening for aortic valve pathologies.
Keywords:Aortic valve disease  Cardiac multidetector computed tomography  Aortic valve area  Echocardiography  Invasive catheter
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号