首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

MCC与BuCy预处理方案在慢性髓性白血病异基因干细胞移植后长期疗效的比较
引用本文:贾永前,刘霆,徐才刚,牛挺,孟文彤,鲁建春,王晖,冷亚美.MCC与BuCy预处理方案在慢性髓性白血病异基因干细胞移植后长期疗效的比较[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2006,37(2):226-229.
作者姓名:贾永前  刘霆  徐才刚  牛挺  孟文彤  鲁建春  王晖  冷亚美
作者单位:四川大学华西医院,血液科,成都,610041
摘    要:目的观察MCC和BuCy预处理方案治疗慢性髓性白血病(CML)移植后的长期疗效和毒副反应。方法采用MCC方案(马法兰170mg/m2·d×1,环已亚硝脲400mg/m2·d×1,环磷酰胺60mg/kg·d×2)预处理治疗CML14例,中位随访时间6年;采用BuCy方案(马利兰4mg/kg·d×4,环磷酰胺60mg/kg·d×2)预处理治疗CML16例,中位随访时间4年。结果30例病人全部植活,MCC组+100d移植嵌合状态高于BuCy组,但移植后2年全部均转为完全供者植入,bcr-abl融合基因检测阴性。MCC组移植相关死亡3例(21%),复发死亡1例(7%),5年无病存活率71.4%;BuCy组移植相关死亡4例(25%),复发死亡2例(12%),5年无病存活率62.5%。两组生存率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。MCC组移植相关毒性和肝静脉闭塞病的发生较BuCy组低,中位住院时间MCC组39d,BuCy组55d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论低强度MCC预处理方案的长期疗效与传统BuCy方案相似,但移植相关毒性较低。在卫生经济学方面MCC预处理方案具有优势。

关 键 词:预处理方案  慢性髓性白血病  异基因干细胞移植
收稿时间:2005-05-08
修稿时间:2005-09-02

Comparison of the Long Term Results Between Two Conditioning Regimens MCC and BuCy in Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
JIA Yong-qian,LIU Ting,XU Cai-gang,NIU Ting,MENG Wen-tong,LU Jian-chun,WANG Hui,LENG Ya-mei.Comparison of the Long Term Results Between Two Conditioning Regimens MCC and BuCy in Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation[J].Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences,2006,37(2):226-229.
Authors:JIA Yong-qian  LIU Ting  XU Cai-gang  NIU Ting  MENG Wen-tong  LU Jian-chun  WANG Hui  LENG Ya-mei
Institution:Division of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To observe and evaluate the long term survival of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia transplanted with MCC and BuCy conditioning regimens. METHODS: Fourteen cases were treated with MCC regimen (Melphanlan 170 mg/m2 x d x 1, MeCCNU 400 mg/m2 x d x 1, CTX 60 mg/kg x d x 2) and the median follow up time was 6 years; 16 cases were treated with BuCy regimen (Busulfan 4 mg/kg x d x 4, CTX 60 mg/kg x d x 2) and the median follow up time was 4 year. RESULTS: All the patients were engrafted successfully. 4 of 10 patients examined in MCC group showed mixed chimerism at day 100 after transplantation, whereas only 1 of 12 patients examined in BuCy group showed mixed chimerism. All the patients became complete donor source later without any DLI. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 71.4% for MCC group and 62.5% for BuCy group. The transplant related mortality and relapse rate were 21% and 7% for MCC group, whereas those were 25% and 12% for BuCy group, respectively. The regimen related toxicity was relatively lower in MCC group and the median duration of hospitalization was 39 days (25-55 days) for patients with MCC regimen, and 55 days (39-90 days) for BuCy regimen. CONCLUSION: MCC regimen has a partial ablative effect on CML and the long term disease-free survival is the same as that of BuCy regimen. In regard to the cost-effect efficacy, MCC regimen has a substantial advantage over BuCy regimen.
Keywords:MCC  BuCy
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号