首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


SuPAR and PAI-1 in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients
Authors:Ville Jalkanen  Runkuan Yang  Rita Linko  Heini Huhtala  Marjatta Okkonen  Tero Varpula  Ville Pettilä  Jyrki Tenhunen
Institution:1. Critical Care Medicine Research Group, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, PO BOX 2000, 33521, Tampere, Finland
2. Division of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO BOX 340, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
3. School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014, Tampere, Finland
4. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
5. Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract:

Purpose

SuPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) and PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor 1) are active in the coagulation-fibrinolysis pathway. Both have been suggested as biomarkers for disease severity. We evaluated them in prediction of mortality, acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in operative and non-operative ventilated patients.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Blood samples and data of intensive care were collected. Mechanically ventilated patients with baseline suPAR and PAI-1 measurements were included in the analysis, and healthy volunteers were analysed for comparison. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC), logistic regression, likelihood ratios and Kaplan–Meier analysis were performed.

Results

Baseline suPAR was 11.6 ng/ml (quartiles Q1–Q3, 9.6–14.0), compared to healthy volunteers with suPAR of 0.6 ng/ml (0.5–11.0). PAI-1 concentrations were 2.67 ng/ml (1.53–4.69) and 0.3 ng/ml (0.3–0.4), respectively. ROC analysis for suPAR 90-day mortality areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) 0.61 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.55–0.67), sepsis 0.68 (0.61–0.76), ALI/ARDS 0.64 (0.56–0.73) and RRT 0.65 (0.56–0.73). Patients with the highest quartile of suPAR concentrations had an odds ratio of 2.52 (1.37–4.64, p = 0.003) for 90-day mortality and 3.16 (1.19–8.41, p = 0.02) for ALI/ARDS. In non-operative patients, the AUC’s for suPAR were 90-day mortality 0.61 (0.54–0.68), RRT 0.73 (0.64–0.83), sepsis 0.70 (0.60–0.80), ALI/ARDS 0.61 (0.51–0.71). Predictive value of PAI-1 was negligible.

Conclusions

In non-operative patients, low concentrations of suPAR were predictive for survival and high concentrations for RRT and mortality. SuPAR may be used for screening for patients with potentially good survival. The association with RRT may supply an early warning sign for acute renal failure.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号