首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

围胰腺区域性微创治疗重症急性胰腺炎的临床效果观察
引用本文:肖文明,刘国利. 围胰腺区域性微创治疗重症急性胰腺炎的临床效果观察[J]. 中国当代医药, 2013, 0(1): 39-40
作者姓名:肖文明  刘国利
作者单位:中南大学湘雅二医院外科
摘    要:目的对采取围胰腺区域性微创治疗法对重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)进行治疗的临床疗效进行评价分析。方法随机抽取2010年3月~2012年3月本院收治的重症急性胰腺炎患者64例,将其分成对照组和观察组,分别采取常规治疗和在常规治疗基础上实施围胰腺区域性微创治疗。对两组患者的治疗效果以及相关观察指标进行对比分析。结果观察组患者的治疗有效率(96.9%)显著高于对照组(81.3%),且两组差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论围胰腺区域性微创治疗重症急性胰腺炎的临床疗效确切,并发症发生率低,对改善患者的康复水平具有重要意义,值得给予关注。

关 键 词:围胰腺区域性微创治疗  重症急性胰腺炎  临床疗效  并发症

The clinical effect on minimally invasive surgical treatment with per-pancreat region for severve acute pancreatitis
XIAO Wenming,LIU Guoli. The clinical effect on minimally invasive surgical treatment with per-pancreat region for severve acute pancreatitis[J]. http://www.botanicus.org/, 2013, 0(1): 39-40
Authors:XIAO Wenming  LIU Guoli
Affiliation:Surgical Department, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410000, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate and analyze the clinical effect of the minimally invasive surgical treatment with per-panereat region for severve acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods Sixty-four patients with SAP were randomly chosen in our hospital from March 2010 to March 2012. They were divided into observation group and control group. Conventional treatment and minimally invasive surgical treatment based on conventional method were applied seperately. The effectiveness and related indexes were compared and analyzed. Results The total effective rate was 96.9% in observation group, higher than 81.3% in control group, there were significant differences (P 0.05). Conclusion Treatment of per-pancreat region for severve acute pancreatitis by minimally invasive treatment has reliable effectiveness. It has the significance to improve the recovery of patients and it is worth concerning.
Keywords:Minimally invasive treatment on per-pancreat region  Severve acute pancreatitis  Clinical effect  Complication
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号