阴道后壁脱垂桥式修补术与传统修补术的比较

目的比较自体组织＂桥＂式修复术与传统阴道后壁修补术治疗阴道后壁脱垂临床效果。方法对照比较新乡医学院第一附属医院妇产科2004年6月至2007年6月行传统阴道后壁修补术28例和2006年6月至2007年6月30例行自体组织＂桥＂式修复术治疗阴道后壁脱垂的患者,比较分析两组阴道后壁脱垂分度、术中出血量、手术并发症、手术时间以及随访近远期复发情况。结果两组术中出血量、手术并发症、手术时间和术后复发情况差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论自体组织＂桥＂式修复术简便易行,临床效果优于传统修复术,且效果肯定。

Comparison of vaginal bridge repair and classical repair in treatment vaginal posterior prolapse

Objective To compare the clinical effects of vaginal bridge repair and classical repair in treatment vaginal posterior proplapse.Methods The clinical data of cases with vaginal posterior prolapse had been repaired in the first affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang medical were collected 30 cases were treated by vaginal bridge repair and 28 cases by classical repair.The operation time,blood loss in the operation,surgical complications we re analyzed and compared between the two groups.Results The operation time and blood loss were dncreased obviously in vaginal bridge repair group compare with those in the classical group.And the number of surgical complications dncreased obviously in vaginal bridge repair group compare with those in the classical group.Conclusion Antologous vaginal bridge repair is effective,safe and feasible.