Labyrinthine fenestration in the guinea pig.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the auditory effects of single, double, and triple semicircular canal fenestration procedures, with and without sealing the labyrinthine defect. BACKGROUND: Violation of the inner ear remains a feared complication in otologic surgery because it commonly leads to profound sensorineural hearing loss. It has been assumed that the natural history of labyrinthine injury in the guinea pig is similar to that in human beings; however, this assumption has not been rigorously studied. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and controlled animal study. SUBJECTS: Sixty pigmented guinea pigs. OUTCOME: Click-evoked electrocochleographic response, with same-ear prefenestration control. RESULTS: All of the fenestration groups had elevated auditory thresholds at 1 hour when compared with controls (P < 0.01); however, this difference lost statistical significance at 1 and 4 weeks. The degree of labyrinthine injury did not correlate with the degree of hearing loss or with the incidence of anacusis. Hearing remained stable during the study period. Sealing the fenestration had no significant audiologic effect (P > 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: The guinea pig model of labyrinthine fenestration may not be representative of the human condition.