首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

传统包皮环切术与包皮环切吻合术的疗效分析
引用本文:陈从其,林云侨. 传统包皮环切术与包皮环切吻合术的疗效分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2012, 21(2): 20-20,22
作者姓名:陈从其  林云侨
作者单位:福建医科大学附属临床教学医院宁德市医院,福建宁德,352100
摘    要:目的:对传统包皮环切术与包皮环切吻合术的疗效进行分析.方法:对271例患者随机分成两组,分别采用传统包皮环切术与包皮环切吻合术,对两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症、CIEF -5进行记录,行统计学分析.结果:包皮环切吻合术组切口愈合好,外形美观,且手术时间、术中出血量明显少于传统组(P<0.05);术后并发症发生率低于传统组(P<0.05),性生活质量与传统组差异无显著性(P>0.05).结论:包皮环切吻合术较传统术操作简单,疗效满意,值得推广.

关 键 词:包皮环切  包皮过长  包茎

A comparison on therapeutic efficacy between traditional circumcision and improved circumcision
CHEN Congqi , LIN Yunqiao. A comparison on therapeutic efficacy between traditional circumcision and improved circumcision[J]. The Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality, 2012, 21(2): 20-20,22
Authors:CHEN Congqi    LIN Yunqiao
Affiliation:CHEN Congqi, L1N Yunqiao Ninde Hospital, the Teaching hospital of Fujian Medical University, Ninde 352100, China
Abstract:Objectives: The therapeutic efficacy was compared between traditional circumcision and improved circumci- sion. Methods : Two hundred and seventy - one cases were randomly divided into two groups and were performed with traditional circumcision and improved circumcision respectively. The operation time, blood loss, post -operative complication and CIEF- 5 were recorded and statistically analyzed. Result: Improved circumcision group showed better healing process, nicer cut appear- mace. Both the operation time and blood loss of improved circumcision group were significmafly less than the traditional group (P 〈 0.05 ) ; The incidence of postoperative complications was also significantly lower than the traditional group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . How- ever, there indicated no significant differences between the two groups in the quality of sexual life ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion: The improved circumcision is simpler and more effective than the traditional circumcision.
Keywords:Circumcision  Phimosis  Redundant prepuce
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号