首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺冲击疗法在狼疮性肾炎诱导治疗中的对照研究
引用本文:陆福明,杨海春,匡鼎伟,马骥,朱彤莹,沈雯,顾勇,林善锬. 霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺冲击疗法在狼疮性肾炎诱导治疗中的对照研究[J]. 第二军医大学学报, 2002, 23(6): 652-655
作者姓名:陆福明  杨海春  匡鼎伟  马骥  朱彤莹  沈雯  顾勇  林善锬
作者单位:复旦大学附属华山医院肾内科,上海,200040
摘    要:目的:比较新型免疫抑制剂霉酚酸酯(MMF)与间断性环磷酰胺(CTX)静脉冲击疗法对活性狼疮肾炎(LN)的诱导治疗效果及不良反应发生情况。方法:27例活动性LN患者分组,12例予MMF1.0-1.5g/d为口服 治疗(MMF组),15例行间断性CTX冲击治疗(0.75-1.0g/m^2,CTX组)两组均联合服用泼尼松,两组治疗前一般情况相似,治疗期6个月,随访相关指标并监测伴随的不良反应,部分患者作重复肾活检。结果:两组患者治疗后全身狼疮活动均明显受到控制,MMF组在尿蛋白下降,贫血改善,肾功能改善及抑制自身抗体程度方面均比CTX组更为明显,MMF组中9例重复肾活检示肾脏病理均有明显改善,CTX组中有2例重复肾活检示肾脏病理改善不佳,MMF组不良反应发生率明显低于CTX组,结论:MMF联合激素在LN诱导治疗中比CTX冲击联合激素疗效更为突出,且伴随的不良反应较少。

关 键 词:霉酚酸酯 环磷酰胺 冲击疗法 狼疮性肾炎 诱导治疗 对照研究
文章编号:0258-879X(2002)06-0652-04
修稿时间:2002-01-22

Comparison between mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in induction treatment of active lupus nephritis
LU Fu Ming,YANG Hai Chun,KUANG Ding Wei,MA Ji,ZHU Tong Ying,SHEN Wen,GU Yong,LIN Shan Yan. Comparison between mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in induction treatment of active lupus nephritis[J]. Former Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University, 2002, 23(6): 652-655
Authors:LU Fu Ming  YANG Hai Chun  KUANG Ding Wei  MA Ji  ZHU Tong Ying  SHEN Wen  GU Yong  LIN Shan Yan
Abstract:Objective:To compare the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) pulse therapy in induction treatment of active lupus nephritis (LN). Methods:Twenty seven LN patients were included. Twelve patients were given MMF at a dose of 1.0 1.5 g/d orally(MMF group). The other 15 patients matched with age, sex and severity of renal damage were given CTX (0.75 1.0 g/m 2 body surface area) monthly for 6 months(CTX group).Both groups were supplemented with oral prednisone. The renal biopsy, blood and urinary routine, hepatic and renal function, 24 h urinary protein excretion, creatinine clearance(Ccr), anti dsDNA antibody titer, antinuclear antibody, serum complement C 3, immunoglobulin G and associated adverse effect were observed before and after treatment in both groups. Results:The SLE DAI, proteinuria, hematuria, anti dsDNA antibody titer and lower serum complement C 3 level were significantly improved in both groups after treatment ( P <0.05). Urinary protein excretion and anti dsDNA antibody titer in MMF group were lower than that of CTX group after treatment( P <0.05). Ccr and anemia were improved obviously in MMF group ( P <0.05), but changed slightly in CTX group( P >0.05).Nine patients in MMF group and 2 in CTX group had repeat renal biopsy. The active index and renal immune complex deposition decreased dramatically after given MMF, but the chronic index had no significant difference after treatment.There was no obvious improvement in CTX group.The incidence of complications was slighter in MMF group. Conclusion:MMF is more effective than CTX pulse therapy in the induction treatment of active LN, and with lower adverse effect.
Keywords:mycophenolate mofetil  cyclophosphamide  lupus nephritis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号