间接法MRI膝关节造影对半月板撕裂的评价

目的　评价间接法MRI膝关节造影对半月板撕裂的诊断价值。方法　回顾性分析 75例常规MRI膝关节扫描和 6 4例间接法MRI膝关节造影病例资料 ,以膝关节镜检查为诊断金标准 ,对比分析常规MRI和间接法MRI膝关节造影对半月板撕裂的诊断。结果　间接法MRI膝关节造影对内侧半月板撕裂的诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 72 %,10 0 %,89.1%,10 0 %和 84.8%;对外侧半月板撕裂分别为 83.8%,90 .9%,87.5 %,89.6 %和 85 .7%。与常规MRI比较 ,间接法MRI膝关节造影对内外侧半月板撕裂的诊断能力都没有统计学差异。结论　尽管间接法MRI膝关节造影对内外侧半月板撕裂诊断价值很高 ,但与常规MRI比较没有统计学差异。

The Value of Indirect MRI Arthrography in Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears

Objective To determine the diagnostic value of indirect MRI arthrography for meniscal tears.Methods 75 cases of routine MRI of the knee and 64 cases of indirect MRI arthrography of the knee were retrospectively reviewed.These patients all had subsequently arthroscopic examination.Based on the results of arthroscopic examination,the diagnostic value for meniscal tear of routine MRI and indirect MRI arthrography were compared.Results For medial meniscal tears,the indirect MRI arthrography gave a sensitivity of 72%,specificity of 100%,accuracy of 89.1%,positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 84.8%.For lateral meniscal tears,the indirect MRI arthrography gave a sensitivity of 83.8%,specificity of 90.9%,accuracy of 87.5%,positive predictive value of 89.6% and negative predictive value of 85.7%.No matter for medical meniscal tears or lateral meniscal tears,the diagnostic differences between the indirect MRI arthrography and the routine MRI were not statistical significant.Conclusion Although the diagnostic value of indirect MRI arthrography for meniscal tears was quite high,it was not different with routine MRI statistically.