医事侵权立法之不足

文章通过对医疗权的论述,证明医疗权与一般民事权相比有其自身的特殊性,因此《侵权责任法》这一专门调整民事侵权的法律,将医疗侵权纳入其调整范围,并不十分恰当;加之《侵权责任法》第七章中有些条文存在多处法律冲突,不仅未能解决在司法审判中反映最为强烈的鉴定＂二元化＂和程序＂二元化＂问题,反而还有可能增加新的＂二元化＂问题——适用法律的＂二元化＂问题。《侵权责任法》第七章仅有11个条文无法解决所有医疗侵权问题,失之过简。为此,笔者认为要解决医疗侵权责任问题应当适时进行专门立法。

Shortage of Medical Tort Legislation

The article firstly discussed the right to healthcare,and argued that the right to healthcare compared to general civil right has its own particularity,so ＂Tort Liability Act＂ as a special law for tort adjustment,is not too appropriate to bring the medical tort into its adjustment range;otherwise,some provisions in the Chapter Ⅶ of ＂Tort Liability Act＂ are conflicted with some other laws,so that ＂Tort Liability Act＂ not only failed to address the most troublesome issues including the identification duality and the procedure duality,but increased new issues on duality,the duality applicable for law.Eleven items of provisions in the Chapter Ⅶ of ＂Tort Liability Act＂ cannot solve all problems of medical tort,losing in oversimplification.Therefore,the author believed it necessary to make a special legislation in due time to solve the problem of medical tort liability