首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of monoclonal antibodies for the detection of occult breast carcinoma metastases in bone marrow
Authors:Ann Thor  Mary Jo Viglione  Noriaki Ohuchi  Jean Simpson  Ronald Steis  John Cousar  Marc Lippman  Donald W. Kufe  Jeffrey Schlom
Affiliation:(1) Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, NIH, NCI, Building 10, Room 8B07, 20892 Bethesda, MD, USA;(2) Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 20892 Bethesda, MD, USA;(3) Medical Breast Cancer Section, Medicine Branch, NIH, NCI, 20892 Bethesda, MD, USA;(4) Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Hospital, 37232 Nashville, TN, USA;(5) Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 02115 Boston, MA, USA
Abstract:Summary Twenty percent (n = 6) of Stage III or IV breast cancer patients (n = 30) had bone marrow metastases detected in bilateral bone marrow biopsy/aspiration preparations using standard histologic preparations. Each metastasis was also detected by four separate monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) which recognize breast carcinoma associated antigens (DF3, anti-EMA, HMFG-2, and CAM5.2). These MAbs were then utilized to stain other bone marrow preparations (n = 81) to determine their utility for the detection of micrometastatic breast carcinoma. MAbs HMFG-2, anti-EMA, and DF3 were each strongly reactive with bone marrows containing histologically-evident metastatic breast carcinoma (18/18). These anti-epithelial membrane antigen MAbs, however, were also reactive with rare plasma cells and immature cells (as well as cell clusters) in some of the control bone marrow samples tested, including those from normal patients and patients with hematologic disorders. They also reacted with some of the preparations from patients with leukemia and lymphoma, and with uninvolved marrows from patients with non-epithelial malignancies. The anti-keratin MAb CAM5.2, in contrast, reacted with 83% (15/18) breast cancer metastases and failed to stain any cells in the various categories of control marrow preparations. These data suggested that MAb CAM5.2 might be utilized to immunohistochemically differentiate micrometastatic breast carcinoma from immature myeloid or erythroid elements.Each MAb was then reacted with histologically uninvolved marrow preparations from the remaining 24 of 30 breast cancer patients in an attempt to identify occult breast carcinoma metastases. While MAbs HMFG-2, DF3, and anti-EMA demonstrated reactive cells in some of these marrows, this reactivity was similar to that seen with control preparations. MAb CAM5.2, in contrast, was negative with all specimens. These data suggest that MAb CAM5.2 may be a useful immunologic probe for the detection and confirmation of metastatic breast carcinoma in bone marrow, while more caution must be employed in the interpretation of results obtained using MAbs anti-EMA, DF3, and HMFG-2.
Keywords:bone marrow  breast carcinoma  cytokeratin  epithelial antigens  immunohistochemistry  monoclonal antibodies  micrometastasis
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号