首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

联合方案治疗BRVO-ME远期疗效的Meta分析
引用本文:吴香瑞,梁凤鸣,宋帅.联合方案治疗BRVO-ME远期疗效的Meta分析[J].国际眼科杂志,2021,21(1):92-98.
作者姓名:吴香瑞  梁凤鸣  宋帅
作者单位:中国天津市,天津中医药大学第一附属医院 国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,中国天津市,天津中医药大学第一附属医院 国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心,中国天津市,天津中医药大学第一附属医院 国家中医针灸临床医学研究中心
基金项目:中医眼科专病循证能力提升建设(No.2019XZZX-YK012)
摘    要:目的:评价视网膜激光光凝联合玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗与单纯雷珠单抗治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿(BRVO-ME)的远期疗效及安全性。方法:系统检索Embase、The Cochrane Library、PubMed、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、万方数据库(Wanfang Database)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)关于激光和雷珠单抗治疗BRVO-ME的随机对照临床研究文献,对纳入研究进行风险评估、提取数据指标。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行数据分析,采用漏斗图评价发表偏倚。结果:共纳入7项研究,641眼。激光联合雷珠单抗组和单纯雷珠单抗组患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)在治疗后12moWMD=0.00,95%CI(-0.13,0.14),P=0.95]和24moWMD=0.05,95%CI(-0.12,0.22),P=0.57]变化均无明显差异。两组在治疗12moWMD=-7.67,95%CI(-54.58,39.24),P=0.75]和24moWMD=12.21,95%CI(-81.68,106.09),P=0.80]黄斑中心凹厚度的变化无明显差异。两组在12、24mo的雷珠单抗注药次数及最终不良事件发生情况方面亦无统计学差异。结论:激光联合雷珠单抗相较单纯雷珠单抗治疗BRVO-ME,在视力和黄斑中心凹厚度方面的远期结果无明显差异,在雷珠单抗的注药次数和安全性方面也无较大差距。

关 键 词:视网膜激光光凝  雷珠单抗  抗VEGF治疗  视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿  META分析  远期疗效  安全性
收稿时间:2020/6/16 0:00:00
修稿时间:2020/12/9 0:00:00

Meta-analysis of long-term efficacy of combined regimen in treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
Xiang-Rui Wu,Feng-Ming Liang and Shuai Song.Meta-analysis of long-term efficacy of combined regimen in treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion[J].International Journal of Ophthalmology,2021,21(1):92-98.
Authors:Xiang-Rui Wu  Feng-Ming Liang and Shuai Song
Institution:First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin 300193, China,First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin 300193, China and First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Tianjin 300193, China
Abstract:AIM:To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of retinal photocoagulation combined with intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab(IVR)and simple Ranibizumab in the treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion secondary macular edema(BRVO-ME).

METHODS: The literatures related to randomized controlled clinical studies on the treatment of BRVO-ME with laser and Ranibizumab in Embase, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Wanfang Database and China Science and Technology Journal Database(VIP)were systematically retrieved, and the risk assessment was carried out and data indicators were extracted for the included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis and funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias.

RESULTS: Totally 7 studies were included, with 641 eyes. There was no significant difference in the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)between the laser combined with Ranibizumab group and the simple Ranibizumab group at 12mo \ and 24mo \ after treatment. There was no significant difference in central foveal thickness between the two groups at 12mo \ and 24mo \. There were no statistically significant differences in the injection times of Ranibizumab and the incidence of final adverse events between the two groups at 12mo and 24mo after treatment.

CONCLUSION: Compared with the treatment of BRVO-ME with simple Ranibizumab, there was no significant difference in the long-term efficacy of vision and central foveal thickness for the laser combined with Ranibizumab, and there was no significant difference in the injection times and safety of Ranibizumab.

Keywords:retinal laser photocoagulation  ranibizumab  anti-VEGF therapy  macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion  Meta-analysis  long-term efficacy  safety
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号