首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

无精子症病人100例取精方法及妊娠结局
引用本文:欧建平,庄广伦,周灿权,王长希,方丛,舒益民,詹前胜,彭文林,张敏芳.无精子症病人100例取精方法及妊娠结局[J].中华男科学杂志,2002,8(4):258-260.
作者姓名:欧建平  庄广伦  周灿权  王长希  方丛  舒益民  詹前胜  彭文林  张敏芳
作者单位:中山大学附属第一医院妇产科生殖医学中心,广东,广州,510080
摘    要:目的 :回顾性分析 2 0 0 1年 1月~ 2 0 0 2年 1月在生殖中心行卵胞质内单精子注射 (ICSI)治疗的 10 0例无精子症男性的治疗结果。 方法 :经皮附睾精子抽吸术 (PESA)或睾丸精子抽提术 (TESE)获得精子 ,女方进行常规超排卵。分析激素水平 ,行睾丸组织学检查 ,评估取精的成功率、受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率。 结果 :76例(76 % )经PESA获得精子 ,2 3例 (2 3% )通过TESE获得精子。PESA和TESE组的受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率分别为 71.3%和 75 .18% ,2 0 .35 %和 2 2 .0 5 % ,4 2 .11%和 4 1.6 0 %。PESA组有 32例临床妊娠 ,其中 15例继续妊娠 ,15例已分娩 ,2例流产。TESE组有 10例临床妊娠 ,其中 6例继续妊娠 ,2例已分娩 ,2例流产。两组的受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率差异无显著性。在TESE组有 1例取精失败而放弃治疗。 结论 :激素水平和睾丸组织学检查不能预测附睾或睾丸取精的成功 ,PESA和TESE获得精子进行单精子注射是治疗男性无精子症的有效方法 ,两组的受精率 ,种植率和临床妊娠率差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。

关 键 词:无精子症  经皮附睾精子抽吸术  睾丸精子抽提术  卵胞质内单精子注射
文章编号:1009-3591(2002)04-0258-03
修稿时间:2002年5月8日

Sperm Retrieval Methods and Pregnancy Outcome of 100 Azoospermia Patients
Jian Ping OU,Guang Lun ZHUANG,Can Quan ZHOU,Chang Xi WANG,Cong FANG,Yi Min SHU,Qian Sheng ZHAN,Wen Lin PENG,Min Fang ZHANG.Sperm Retrieval Methods and Pregnancy Outcome of 100 Azoospermia Patients[J].National Journal of Andrology,2002,8(4):258-260.
Authors:Jian Ping OU  Guang Lun ZHUANG  Can Quan ZHOU  Chang Xi WANG  Cong FANG  Yi Min SHU  Qian Sheng ZHAN  Wen Lin PENG  Min Fang ZHANG
Institution:Reproductive Medicine Research Center of First Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China.
Abstract:Objectives: To review the retrospective treatment results of the azoospermia patients during January 2001 to January 2002 in the fertility center. Methods: One hundred males attempted intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle for treatment of azoospermia. All patients were undergone sperm retrieval by percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) while their wives received conventional ovarian hyperstimulation. The hormone levels, testicular histology, the rates of sperm retrieval, fertilization, implantation and pregnancy were analysed and evaluated. Results: Sperm were retrieved by PESA in 76 of 100 (76%) and by TESE in 23 of 100 (23%) men of azoospermia. The fertilization rate, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were 71.3 %, 20.35 % and 42.11 % respectively in PESA group, and 75.18 %, 22.05 % and 41.60 % respectively in TESA group. Thirty two clinical pregnancies were achieved with 15 ongoing pregnancies and subsequent live delivery for 15 cases in PESA group, and 2 cases of miscarriage, while 10 clinical pregnancies were achieved with 6 ongoing pregnancies, 2 cases of live delivery and 2 cases of miscarriage in TESA group. One case failed to retrieve sperm by TESE and cancelled. Conclusions: Hormonal levels and testicular histology are unable to predict which men with azoospermia will have sperm retrieved by PESA and TESE. PESA and TESE with ICSI are effective methods to treat azoospermia. There were no significant differences in fertilization, implantation and clinical pregnancy rate between two groups.
Keywords:Azoospermia  Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration  Testicular sperm extraction  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号