首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Inhibitory effects of heterotopic noxious counter‐stimulation on perception and brain activity related to Aβ‐fibre activation
Authors:Nabi Rustamov  Jessica Tessier  Benjamin Provencher  Alexandre Lehmann  Mathieu Piché
Institution:1. Department of Chiropractic, Université du Québec à Trois‐Rivières, Trois‐Rivières, QC, Canada;2. Groupe de Recherche en Cognition, Neuroscience, Affect et Comportement (CogNAC), Université du Québec à Trois‐Rivières, Trois‐Rivières, QC, Canada;3. Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada;4. International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research & Center for Research on Brain, Language and Music, Montreal, QC, Canada
Abstract:Heterotopic noxious counter‐stimulation (HNCS) inhibits pain and pain processes through cerebral and cerebrospinal mechanisms. However, it is unclear whether HNCS inhibits non‐nociceptive processes, which needs to be clarified for a better understanding of HNCS analgesia. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of HNCS on perception and scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in two counter‐balanced sessions, including non‐nociceptive (selective Aβ‐fibre activation) or nociceptive electrical stimulation, combined with HNCS. HNCS was produced by a 20‐min cold pressor test (left hand) adjusted individually to produce moderate pain (mean ± SEM: 42.5 ± 5.3 on a 0–100 scale, where 0 is no pain and 100 the worst pain imaginable). Non‐nociceptive electrical stimulation was adjusted individually at 80% of pain threshold and produced a tactile sensation in every subject. Nociceptive electrical stimulation was adjusted individually at 120% of RIII‐reflex threshold and produced moderate pain (45.3 ± 4.5). Shock sensation was significantly decreased by HNCS compared with baseline for non‐nociceptive (< 0.001) and nociceptive (< 0.001) stimulation. SEP peak‐to‐peak amplitude at Cz was significantly decreased by HNCS for non‐nociceptive (< 0.01) and nociceptive (< 0.05) stimulation. These results indicate that perception and brain activity related to Aβ‐fibre activation are inhibited by HNCS. The mechanisms of this effect remain to be investigated to clarify whether it involves inhibition of spinal wide‐dynamic‐range neurons by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, supraspinal processes or both.
Keywords:brain activity     CPM        DNIC     human  pain  tactile
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号