首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

超声造影在评价肾动脉狭窄中的价值
引用本文:肖迎聪. 超声造影在评价肾动脉狭窄中的价值[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2011, 27(18): 2743-2744
作者姓名:肖迎聪
作者单位:陕西中医学院医技系陕西中医学院附属医院B超室,陕西成阳,712046
摘    要:目的:探讨超声造影评价肾动脉狭窄的价值.方法:对41例患者,先行双肾动脉的彩色多普勒血流显像(color doppler flow image,C DFI)和超声造影,将其结果和血管造影对照.结果:将3种方法的显示结果分为4种情况:正常,狭窄,能显示副肾动脉,显示不清.结果显示CDFI和其他两者比较差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01),而超声造影和血管造影比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:超声造影对于狭窄>60%的肾动脉狭窄有确切的诊断价值,有望成为临床首选.

关 键 词:超声造影  血管造影  肾动脉狭窄

Values of ultrasound contrast in evaluation of renal artery stenosis
XIAO Ying-cong. Values of ultrasound contrast in evaluation of renal artery stenosis[J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN MEDICINE & HEALTH, 2011, 27(18): 2743-2744
Authors:XIAO Ying-cong
Affiliation:XIAO Ying-cong(Department of Medical Technology,Affiliated Hospital,Shaanxi College of Chinese Medicine,Xianyang,Shaanxi 712046,China)
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the value of ultrasound contrast in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis(RAS).Methods:Color Doppler flow imaging(CDFI) and ultrasound contrast characteristics of 41 patients with RAS were compared with the results of angiography.Results:The revealing results of three methods were divided into four statuses: normal,stenosis,showing accessory renal artery and unclear showing.The results showed significant difference between CDFI and the other two methods(P<0.01),and no significant d...
Keywords:Ultrasound contrast  Angiography  RAS  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号