A survey of the economic impact of subclinical Eimeria infections in broiler chickens in Norway |
| |
Authors: | Anita Haug Anne-Gerd Gjevre Eystein Skjerve Magne Kaldhusdal |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Pathology , National Veterinary Institute , Ullev?lsveien 68, Pb. 8156 , Oslo , Norway;2. Department of Parasitology (SWEPAR) , National Veterinary Institute and Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , SE-751 89 , Uppsala , Sweden;3. Department of Pathology , National Veterinary Institute , Ullev?lsveien 68, Pb. 8156 , Oslo , Norway;4. Norwegian School of Veterinary Science , Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Ullev?lsveien 72, Oslo , Norway |
| |
Abstract: | The objective of this work was to examine the impact of subclinical coccidial infection on commercial performance, expressed as a modified European Production Index, in broilers. Performance data, and litter and faecal samples, were collected from two independent observational surveys of Norwegian broilers receiving in-feed narasin during 2000 to 2004. Numbers of oocysts per gram (OPG) of litter collected during rearing (Study 1) or faecal samples collected at slaughter (both studies), and relative frequencies of Eimeria species categories (both studies) were calculated. Polymerase chain reaction-based identification of Eimeria species was performed in Study 2. A definition of flocks at risk of impaired performance associated with coccidia (“risk flock”), using the predominant species and OPG level as criteria, was tested. Coccidia had a significant effect on performance in the first, but not the second study. In Study 1 the following coccidia variables were found to be associated with impaired performance in multivariate models: OPG at slaughter (ordinal), mean OPG during rearing (ordinal) and “risk flock” (binomial). The European Production Index was ~9% lower in flocks with infection levels >50 000 OPG at slaughter in Study 1. The composition of coccidial populations shifted between Study 1 and Study 2, from a dominance of medium and large oocysts to a dominance of small oocysts. There was a substantial increase in prevalence of coccidial infection from Study 1 to Study 2, but mean infection levels were similar in the two surveys. The “risk flock” definition was useful as an indicator of coccidia-associated performance loss in Study 1, where subclinical coccidiosis was an important factor. The results suggest that the economic importance of subclinical coccidiosis may vary substantially with time, and they emphasize the need for population studies on the importance and dynamics of specific coccidial infections under different field conditions. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|