心脏选择性部位起搏的电和机械同步性研究的初步报告

目的观察心脏不同部位起搏时的电及机械同步性和血流动力学变化。方法14例患者分别于右室心尖（RVA）、希氏束部位（His）、右室高位流出道间隔部（RVOT）起搏,记录心输出量和心脏指数;比较不同部位起搏和自身心律时12导联体表心电图的QRS波宽度和方向,以评价电同步性;用全数字化超声诊断系统的向量速度显像评价机械同步性。结果心输出量和心脏指数在RVA起搏时较差,但差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。各部位起搏时QRS波的宽度：His为（124±5．3）ms,RVOT（144±7．1）ms,RVA（156±8．6）ms,均较自身心律（92±4．5）ms时宽（P〈0．01）;而His及RVOT均较RVA起搏时的QRS波时限窄,其差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。向量速度显像检查提示,RVOT起搏相对于RVA起搏有更好的机械同步性。结论RVOT可能较传统的RVA部位起搏好,同时手术操作容易。

Report on initiating clinical research for electrical and mechanical synchronism of selective region pacing in the right ventricular

OBJECTIVE: To verify the electric synchronism, mechanic synchronism and hemodynamics of selective site pacing. METHODS: Pacing in the right ventricular cardiac apex (RVA), the right ventricular His bundle region (His), and the septum of right ventricular high-positioned outflow tract (RVOT), CO and CI were recorded. The electrical synchronism was assessed by observing the width and shape in a 12-lead surface ECG. The mechanical synchronism was estimated by using the VVI (vector velocity imaging) technology of the Acuson Sequia 512. RESULTS: The results showed that CO and CI were lower while pacing in RVA, but they were not significant different (P>0.05). The QRS width: (124 +/- 5.3) ms while pacing in His, (144 +/- 7.1) ms while pacing in RVOT and (156 +/- 8.6) ms while pacing in RVA. The QRS width while pacing in His and in RVOT were narrower than in RVA and there were significant differences (P<0.01). Vector velocity imaging showed that mechanical synchronism was better while pacing in RVOT than that in RVA. CONCLUSION: Pacing in RVOT seems better than pacing in traditional RVA, and the operation was no more difficult than the traditional operation.