首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

ST段抬高的急性心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后单导联ST段回落不良对预后的影响及其预测因素
引用本文:Zhang DP,Yang XC,Wang LF,Ge YG,Wang HS,Li WM,Xu L,Ni ZH,Luan YY,Xue YL. ST段抬高的急性心肌梗死急诊介入治疗后单导联ST段回落不良对预后的影响及其预测因素[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2007, 35(3): 227-232
作者姓名:Zhang DP  Yang XC  Wang LF  Ge YG  Wang HS  Li WM  Xu L  Ni ZH  Luan YY  Xue YL
作者单位:首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院心脏中心,100020
摘    要:目的探讨单个导联ST段回落程度不良对临床预后的影响并筛选其相关的预测因素,以早期识别高危患者,从而积极防止心肌无复流的发生。方法回顾性收集964例急性ST段抬高心肌梗死行急诊PCI患者的临床资料、冠状动脉造影资料与心电图,分析单导联ST段回落不良患者的临床特征及住院期间主要不良心脏事件(MACE)发生的差异,应用统计学软件筛选盯段回落不良的预测因素。结果急诊PCI后梗死相关血管(IRA)前向血流达到TIMIⅢ级而心电图ST段回落小于50%者占27.42%。ST段无回落组其年龄更大、前壁心肌梗死比率更多、心功能分级≥Killip2级更多、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)峰值更高、糖尿病比率更多、纤维蛋白原浓度更大、C反应蛋白(CRP)升高比率更多、入院白细胞水平更高、胸痛至急诊室时间更长、冠状动脉病变更复杂,临床预后比较显示,汀段无回落组平均住院日更长,左室射血分数更低,梗死后心绞痛发生率更高,术后IRA血流TIMIⅢ级达标率更低,心力衰竭、恶性心律失常、心脏性死亡以及总的MACE事件发生率更高(25.5%对4.4%,P〈0.001)。Cox回归分析显示ST段回落不良是住院期间发生MACE的独立预测因素之一(RR=3.33,P〈0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示ST段回落不良的预测因素有前壁心肌梗死、入院心功能分级2级以上(Killip)、胸痛至急诊室时间(h)、入院白细胞计数。结论ST段抬高的心肌梗死急诊PCI后IRA达到TIMIⅢ级血流者仍会有近1/3的患者其心电图ST段回落小于50%,反映其心肌组织水平灌注不良,这些患者住院期间发生MACE的风险明显升高。前壁心肌梗死、入院心功能较差、入院白细胞计数较高、胸痛至急诊室时间较长等均与ST段回落不良高度相关,对具备以上情况的高危患者应采取更加积极的干预方案。

关 键 词:心肌梗塞 血管成形术 经腔 经皮冠状动脉 心电描记术 无再流
修稿时间:2006-09-12

Single lead ST-segment resolution in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: prognostic impact and associated factors
Zhang Da-peng,Yang Xin-chun,Wang Le-feng,Ge Yong-gui,Wang Hong-shi,Li Wei-ming,Xu Li,Ni Zhu-hua,Luan Yu-ying,Xue Yong-li. Single lead ST-segment resolution in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: prognostic impact and associated factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2007, 35(3): 227-232
Authors:Zhang Da-peng  Yang Xin-chun  Wang Le-feng  Ge Yong-gui  Wang Hong-shi  Li Wei-ming  Xu Li  Ni Zhu-hua  Luan Yu-ying  Xue Yong-li
Affiliation:Heart Center, Beifing Chaoyang Hospital, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Capital University of Medical Science, Belting 100020, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of ST resolution (STR) measured in a single ECG lead obtained early after primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: In this retrospective study, STR, MACE and factors contributed to STR were analyzed in 964 patients underwent primary PCI post STEMI. The ECGs analysis was made by technicians blinded to the clinical data. MACE was compared between the STR (n = 662) and the non-STR (n = 302) groups. Factors associated with non-STR were analyzed by logistic regression method. RESULTS: Although TIMI grade III flow was achieved after PCI, non-STR was shown in nearly 1/3 patients and these patients were older, dominant with anterior myocardial infarction, cardiac dysfunction, diabetes and was associated with a higher MACE ratio (25.5% vs. 4.4%, P < 0.001). Cox regression showed that non-STR was one of the independent predictors of in-hospital MACE (RR = 3.33, P < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that anterior myocardial infarction, the pain to balloon time, cardiac dysfunction and white blood cell count on admission were predictive factors of non-STR. CONCLUSIONS: STR obtained in a single ECG lead is an easy and important prognosticator of MACE post PCI in patients with STEMI. It could therefore be used to identify low- and high-risk STEMI patients post primary PCI.
Keywords:Myocardial infarction    Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary   Electrocardiography   No-reflow
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号