| 术中判断肠活力三种方法的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 廖贤平 佘亚雄. 术中判断肠活力三种方法的比较[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 1994, 15(6): 363-364 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 廖贤平 佘亚雄 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海第二医科大学附属新华医院小儿外科 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 术中准确地评价肠活力是外科医师面临的一个普遍问题。应用兔肠缺血模型，比较静脉荧光素、表面血氧测定和激光多普勒三种技术判断肠活力的精确性。结果：诊断效率静脉荧光素法为７８％，表面血氧测定为６８％，激光多普勒为９５％。后者精确度显著优于前二者，且操作简便、迅速，具有临床应用前景。
|
| 关 键 词： | 肠．小，动物．实验，荧光素，血氧定量法，流量计 |
Comparison of Methods for Determination of Viability of Intestine |
| |
| Liao Xian-ping, She Ya-xiong,Li Min.. Comparison of Methods for Determination of Viability of Intestine[J]. Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1994, 15(6): 363-364 |
| |
| Authors: | Liao Xian-ping She Ya-xiong Li Min. |
| |
| Abstract: | Three methods namely the intravenous fluorescein (FLF), Pulse Oximetry ( POX ) and Laser Doppler Flowmeter (LDF) were used in the determination of the bowel viability on the models of intestinal ischemia in rabbits. The reliability of FLF was 78%. FOX 68%, and LDF 95%. LDF was apparently more sensitive than FLF or POX, and may be the most suitable method for the determination of the ischemic intestine intraoperatively. |
| |
| Keywords: | Intestine small Animals laboratory Fluoresceins Oximetry Flowmeters |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
