辨证分型治疗老年高血压随机平行对照研究

[目的]观察辨证分型治疗老年高血压疗效。[方法]使用随机平行对照方法,将110例住院患者按抽签法简单随机为两组。对照组55例硝苯地平,10mg/次,3次/d。治疗组55例1肝阳上亢,天麻钩藤饮(青箱子18g,桑叶12g,决明子9g,菊花12g,白蒺藜10g,生地20g,地龙15g,川牛膝9g,夏枯草15g,桑寄生9g,青木香18g,甘草6g,钩藤18g);2痰湿中阻,白术半夏天麻汤(白术15g,半夏、天麻各10g,陈皮9g,瓜蒌10g,石菖蒲12g,白僵蚕、茯苓、郁金各10g,甘草5g,枳实10g,山楂30g);3肝肾阴虚,左归丸(女贞子12g,甘草10g,川牛膝、熟地各18g,旱莲草、枸杞子各12g,菊花18g,龟胶12g,山药10g,酸枣仁炒25g,地龙18g,菟丝子12g,山茱萸10g);4阴阳两虚,四君汤(白蒺藜10g,生地15g,甘草、茯苓各10g,麦冬20g,仙茅、桂枝各10g,白术30g,枸杞子10g,人参8g,淫羊藿15g);1剂/d,水煎200mL,早晚口服。连续治疗15d为1疗程。观测临床症状、收缩压、舒张压、不良反应。连续治疗3疗程,判定疗效。[结果]治疗组显效39例,有效14例,无效2例,总有效率96.36%。对照组显效26例,有效20例,无效9例,总有效率83.63%。治疗组疗效优于对照组(P0.05)。血压指标治疗组改善优于对照组(P0.05)。[结论]辨证分型治疗老年高血压疗效显著,值得推广。

Differential Treatment of Elderly Hypertensive Patients Randomized Parallel Group Study

[ Objective ] To observe the efficacy of dialectical treatment of elderly patients with hypertension. [ Methods ~ Random parallel control method, 110 cases of hospitalized patients were divided into two groups by drawing lots. The control group 55 cases of nifedipine, 10mg / time, 3 times / d, orally. Treated 55 cases of the following parties have a / d, decoction 200mL, sooner or later, oral ; （~） liver yang Shangni, TGD （ Qingxiangzi 18g, Sangye 12g, Juemingzi 9g, Juhua 12g, Baijili 10g, Shengdi 20g, Dilong 15g, Chuanniuxi 9g, Xiakucao 15g, Sangjisheng 9g, Qingmuxiang 18g, Gancao 6g, Gouteng 18g ） ; （~） phlegm in the resistance, Baizhu Banxia Tianma Tang （ Baizhu 15g, Banxia, Tianma each 10g, Chenpi 9g, Gualou 10g, Changpu 12g, Baijiangcang, Fuling, Yujin each 10g, Gancao 5g, Jishi 10g, Shanzha 30g） ; （~ liver and kidney, Zuoguiwan （Nvzhenzi 12g, Gancaol0g, Chuanniuxi, Shudi each 18g, Hanliancao, Gouqizi each 12g, Juhua 18g, Guijiao 12g, Shanyao 10g, Suanzaoren fried 25g, Dilong 18g, Tusizi 12g, Shanzhuyu 10g） ; （~） Yang and yin that said virtual both yin and yang, Sijun soup （ Baijili 10g, Shengdi 15g, Gancao, Fuling each 10g, Maidong 20g, Xianmao, Guizhi 10g, Baizhu 30g, Gouqizi 10g, Renshen 8g, Yinyanghuo 15g ） . 15d is a continuous course of treatment. Observation of clinical symptoms, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, adverse reactions. Continuous treatment for 3 courses, to determine efficacy. [ Results ] 39 cases markedly effective in 14 cases, 2 cases, the total efficiency of 96.36%. The control group 26 cases markedly effective in 20 cases, 9 cases, the total efficiency of 83.63%. Treatment group than the control group （ P 〈0.05 ）. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure to improve the treatment group than the control group （ P 〈 0.05 ）. [ Conclusion ] Differential Treatment of elderly patients with hypertension effect is significant, it is worth promoting.