IgA serology in recurrent and non-recurrent IgA nephropathy after renal transplantation |
| |
| Authors: | Coppo R; Amore A; Cirina P; Messina M; Basolo B; Segoloni G; Bertgoux F; Boulharouz R; Egido J; Alcazar R; Clarkson A R; Woodroffe A |
| |
| Institution: | 1Multicentre Collaborative Study among the Nephrology and Dialysis Units of: Torino (Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, G. Bosco Hospital, S. Giovanni Hospital) Italy
2Multicentre Collaborative Study among the Nephrology and Dialysis Units of: St Etienne (CHU de Saint Etienne, Hôpital du Nord) France
3Multicentre Collaborative Study among the Nephrology and Dialysis Units of: Madrid (Fundacion J. Diaz) Spain
4Multicentre Collaborative Study among the Nephrology and Dialysis Units of: Adelaide (Royal Adelaide Hospital) Australia |
| |
| Abstract: | BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether abnormal circulation of macromolecularIgA and IgA with altered glycosylation or electrical chargeplays a role in the recurrence of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) aftertransplantation. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 92 renal transplant patients were enrolled; 52 IgANpatients and 40 with other non-IgAN. The IgAN group included10 patients showing IgA mesangial deposits in the grafted kidneys(recurrent group) and 10 who did not (immunohistochemicallyproven non-recurrent group). In addition another 22 IgAN transplantpatients were clinically free of recurrent disease. METHODS: The analyses included macromolecular IgA (IgAIC) detected bythe conglutinin assay (K), heavy IgA precipitated in 2.5% polyethyleneglycol (PEG), IgA-fibronectin aggregates (IgA/F Aggr), mixedIgA/IgGIC, IgA binding to mesangial matrix components (fibronectin,laminin, type IV collagen) or polycations (poly-L-lysine) andIgA with altered glycosylation (Jacalin-binding assay). RESULTS: After transplantation, IgAN patients displayed significantlyhigher mean levels for each variable measured than non-IgAN(ANOVA, P <0.05). By stepwise regression analysis, the bindingof IgA to fibronectin had the highest coefficient. By comparingdata in recurrent and clinically non-recurrent IgAN, we observedthat two groups could be distinguished by the results of thetwo assays for macromolecular IgA (conglutinin IgAIC and IgA-fibronectinaggregates) and IgA with increased affinity for type IV collagen(P <0.05). When the selected group of immunohistochemicallyproven non-recurrent IgAN was compared to the recurrent one,a statistically significant difference was found only for thebinding of IgA to type IV collagen (P<0.05). Data from thistest were significantly related with proteinuria (P<0.05)and microscopic haematuria (P <0.04). CONCLUSION: Even though the IgA serology of renal transplant IgAN patientsshows peculiar features and recurrent and non-recurrent IgANdiffer in many aspects, the prevalence of positive data in thetwo groups had no predictive value. This suggests that the recurrenceof IgAN is modulated by factors affecting the interaction betweencirculating abnormal IgA and mesangial cells and/or matrix. |
| |
| Keywords: | IgA immune complexes IgA serology in IgA nephropathy kidney transplantation recurrence of glomerulonephritis transplanted IgA nephropathy |
| 本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录！ |
|
