电子胃镜与硬质食管镜取出食管嵌钝性异物的对比研究

目的评价经硬式食管镜及经电子胃镜取出食管嵌钝性异物的效果及经济性。方法回顾性分析2013年6月-2017年6月在该院接受内镜下食管嵌钝性异物取出术的60例患者的临床资料,按治疗方式的不同分为研究组和对照组,研究组经电子胃镜取出异物,对照组经硬式食管镜取出异物。记录两组患者的麻醉方式、治疗成功率、并发症发生率、住院时间及治疗费用。结果研究组13例采用局部麻醉,17例采用静脉麻醉,对照组全部釆用气管插管全麻。研究组和对照组治疗成功率差异无统计学意义(96.67%vs100.00%,P0.05)。研究组和对照组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(0.00%vs 3.33%,P0.05)。研究组和对照组住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(1.70±1.39)vs(2.20±1.10)d,P0.05]。研究组治疗费用较对照组明显减少(2 022.00±1 787.45)vs(5 078.00±930.57)元,P0.05]。结论经电子胃镜与经硬质食管镜均为安全、高效的食管嵌钝性异物取出方式,经电子胃镜方式在简便性和经济性上具有更大优势。

Comparison of electronic gastroscope and rigid endoscope on removal of esophageal incarceration foreign bodies

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and economy of electronic gastroscope and rigid endoscope on removal of esophageal incarceration foreign bodies. Methods Data of 60 patients with incarceration esophageal foreign body who underwent endoscopic removal of foreign bodies from June 2013 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into study group (n = 30) and control group (n = 30) based on the therapy way. The study group was given electronic gastroscope, and the control group was given rigid endoscope. Anesthesia method, success rate of therapy, incidence of endoscopy complication, hospitalization time and average cost of hospitalization were recorded. Results 13patients of study group received local anaesthesia, and 17 patients received intravenous anesthesia, all patients of control group received endotracheal intubation anesthesia. Success rate of therapy between the two group showed no significant difference (96.67% vs 100.00%, P > 0.05). There was no significant difference of the incidence of endoscopy complication between the two group (0.00% vs 3.33%, P > 0.05). Hospitalization time showed no significant difference between the two group (1.70 ± 1.39) vs (2.20 ± 1.10) d, P > 0.05]. The average cost of hospitalization in study group was (2 022.00 ± 1 787.45) Yuan RMB, which was significantly lower than that of control group (5 078.00 ± 930.57, P < 0.05). Conclusion Both the way of electronic gastroscope and rigid endoscope are safe and efficient in removal of esophageal foreign bodies, but the former has more advantages in simplicity and economical efficiency.