首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

漂白剂对玻璃离子水门汀类材料充填Ⅴ类洞边缘微渗漏的影响
引用本文:Tang J,Feng Y. 漂白剂对玻璃离子水门汀类材料充填Ⅴ类洞边缘微渗漏的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2012, 30(4): 414-416. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1182.2012.04.021
作者姓名:Tang J  Feng Y
作者单位:中南大学湘雅二医院口腔中心, 长沙410011
基金项目:湖南省科委基金资助项目(06JJ4125);中南大学基本科研业务费重点基金资助项目(2010DXPY012)
摘    要:目的评估漂白凝胶和洁白牙贴对3种不同的玻璃离子水门汀类材料边缘微渗漏的影响。方法在45颗离体健康前磨牙的颊舌侧制备Ⅴ类洞,随机分为A、B、C组,分别使用加强型玻璃离子水门汀KetacTM Molar Easymix、复合体F2000、复合体Dyract AP充填,每个大组再分为3个亚组,第1组和第2组分别使用质量分数14%过氧化氢(HP)洁白牙贴和10%过氧化脲(CP)凝胶进行漂白,第3组为对照组。所有样本置入37 ℃蒸馏水中保存7 d后冷热循环500次,然后进行漂白。漂白21 d后置于碱性品红溶液中染色24 h,沿牙体长轴通过充填体中央颊舌向剖开牙齿,体视显微镜下观察并测量染料渗入窝洞壁的深度。结果2种漂白方式对充填体边缘微渗漏的影响没有明显差异(P>0.05);与对照组相比,2种漂白方式对B、C组的微渗漏均没有产生明显影响(P>0.05),但均可使A组的微渗漏增加(P<0.05)。结论10%CP凝胶和14%HP洁白牙贴对充填体边缘微渗漏的影响无明显差异;漂白不会影响复合体的微渗漏,但会增加加强型玻璃离子水门汀的微渗漏。

关 键 词:漂白   过氧化脲   过氧化氢   微渗漏  
收稿时间:2011-08-17
修稿时间:2012-01-08

Effects of bleaching agents on the microleakage of class V cavities restored with glass-ionomer cements
Tang Jianxia,Feng Yunzhi. Effects of bleaching agents on the microleakage of class V cavities restored with glass-ionomer cements[J]. West China journal of stomatology, 2012, 30(4): 414-416. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1182.2012.04.021
Authors:Tang Jianxia  Feng Yunzhi
Affiliation:Dept. of Stomotology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of a bleaching gel and a whitening strip on the microleakage of three different glass-ionomer cements.Methods Forty-five freshly extracted human premolars were used and class Ⅴ cavity was prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces.The teeth were randomly assigned to A,B and C groups and restored as follows:Conventional strengthen glass-ionomer cement(KetacTM Molar Easymix),compomer(F2000) and compomer(Dyract AP).Teeth were kept in distilled water at 37 ℃ for 7 days.Then the specimens were thermocycled for 500 times.Each group was randomly divided into 3 subgroups which were treated for 21 days with one of the following:Whitening strip(14% hydrogen peroxide),bleaching gel(10% carbamide peroxide),or distilled water(control).After bleaching,the teeth were placed in a solution of basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours,then the teeth were sectioned longi-tudinally to evaluate the dye penetration.The depth of staining along the tooth restoration interface was recorded with a stereomicroscope.Results There were no signicant differences between the two bleaching agents in microleakage of restorations(P>0.05).The two bleaching agents did not significantly affect the microleakage of compomer(P>0.05),whe-reas the microleakage of glass-ionomer cement in the experimental groups was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion There are no significant differences in microleakage of restorations between bleaching gel(10% carbamide peroxide) and whitening strip(14% hydrogen peroxide).The two bleaching agents do not significantly affect the microleakage of compomer but adversely affect the microleakage of strengthen glass-ionomer cement.
Keywords:bleaching  carbamide peroxide  hydrogen peroxide  microleakage
本文献已被 CNKI PubMed 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《华西口腔医学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《华西口腔医学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号