首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Cortical responses to noninvasive perturbations enable individual brain fingerprinting
Affiliation:1. Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Interventional Cognitive Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA;2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;3. Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Deanne and Sidney Wolk Center for Memory Health, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, MA, USA;4. Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA;5. Guttmann Brain Health Institute, Institut Guttmann de Neurorehabilitació, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain;6. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy;7. Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
Abstract:BackgroundIn recent years, it has become increasingly apparent that characterizing individual brain structure, connectivity and dynamics is essential for understanding brain function in health and disease. However, the majority of neuroimaging and brain stimulation research has characterized human brain function by averaging measurements from groups of subjects and providing population-level inferences. External perturbations applied directly to well-defined brain regions can reveal distinctive information about the state, connectivity and dynamics of the human brain at the individual level.ObjectivesIn a series of studies, we aimed to characterize individual brain responses to MRI-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and explore the reproducibility of the evoked effects, differences between brain regions, and their individual specificity.MethodsIn the first study, we administered single pulses of TMS to both anatomically (left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex- ‘L-DLPFC’, left Intra-parietal lobule- ‘L-IPL) and functionally (left motor cortex- ‘L-M1’, right default mode network- ‘R-DMN, right dorsal attention network- ‘R-DAN’) defined cortical nodes in the frontal, motor, and parietal regions across two identical sessions spaced one month apart in 24 healthy volunteers. In the second study, we extended our analyses to two independent data sets (n = 10 in both data sets) having different sham-TMS protocols.ResultsIn the first study, we found that perturbation-induced cortical propagation patterns are heterogeneous across individuals but highly reproducible within individuals, specific to the stimulated region, and distinct from spontaneous activity. Most importantly, we demonstrate that by assessing the spatiotemporal characteristics of TMS-induced brain responses originating from different cortical regions, individual subjects can be identified with perfect accuracy. In the second study, we demonstrated that subject specificity of TEPs is generalizable across independent data sets and distinct from non-transcranial neural responses evoked by sham-TMS protocols.ConclusionsPerturbation-induced brain responses reveal unique “brain fingerprints” that reflect causal connectivity dynamics of the stimulated brain regions, and may serve as reliable biomarkers of individual brain function.
Keywords:Transcranial magnetic stimulation  Electroencephalography  TMS evoked Potentials  Brain fingerprinting
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号