首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Physiological Distribution and Local Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Institution:1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA;2. Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai, China;3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;4. Alef Consulting, Montigny-lès-Metz, France;5. Emory University School of Medicine and Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA;6. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea;7. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Chosun University Hospital, University of Chosun College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea;8. Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Mediplex Sejong Hospital, Incheon, Korea;9. Department of Internal Medicine, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Korea;10. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea;11. Department of Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea;12. Department of Cardiology, Ulsan Medical Center, Ulsan, Korea;13. Department of Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
Abstract:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic implications of physiological 2-dimensional disease patterns on the basis of distribution and local severity of coronary atherosclerosis determined by quantitative flow ratio (QFR) virtual pull back.BackgroundThe beneficial effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is determined by physiological distribution and local severity of coronary atherosclerosis.MethodsThe study population included 341 patients who underwent angiographically successful PCI and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. Using pre-PCI virtual pull backs of QFR, physiological distribution was determined by pull back pressure gradient index, with a cutoff value of 0.78 to define predominant focal versus diffuse disease. Physiological local severity was assessed by instantaneous QFR gradient per unit length, with a cutoff value of ≥0.025/mm to define a major gradient. Suboptimal post-PCI physiological results were defined as both post-PCI FFR ≤0.85 and percentage FFR increase ≤15%. Clinical outcome was assessed by target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years.ResultsQFR pull back pressure gradient index was correlated with post-PCI FFR (R = 0.423; P < 0.001), and instantaneous QFR gradient per unit length was correlated with percentage FFR increase (R = 0.370; P < 0.001). Using the 2 QFR-derived indexes, disease patterns were classified into 4 categories: predominant focal disease with and without major gradient (group 1 n = 150] and group 2 n = 21], respectively) and predominant diffuse disease with and without major gradient (group 3 n = 115] and group 4 n = 55], respectively). Proportions of suboptimal post-PCI physiological results were significantly different according to the 4 disease patterns (18.7%, 23.8%, 22.6%, and 56.4% from group 1 to group 4, respectively; P < 0.001). Cumulative incidence of TVF after PCI was significantly higher in patients with predominant diffuse disease (8.1% in group 3 and 9.9% in group 4 vs 1.4% in group 1 and 0.0% in group 2; overall P = 0.024).ConclusionsBoth physiological distribution and local severity of coronary atherosclerosis could be characterized without pressure-wire pull backs, which determined post-PCI physiological results. After successful PCI, TVF risk was determined mainly by the physiological distribution of coronary atherosclerosis. (Automated Algorithm Detecting Physiologic Major Stenosis and Its Relationship With Post-PCI Clinical Outcomes Algorithm-PCI], NCT04304677; Influence of FFR on the Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention PERSPECTIVE], NCT01873560)
Keywords:coronary artery disease  disease patterns  percutaneous coronary intervention  prognosis  quantitative flow ratio  CI"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0040"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"confidence interval  dFFR(t)/dt"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0050"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"instantaneous fractional flow reserve gradient per unit time  dQFR/ds"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0060"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"instantaneous quantitative flow ratio gradient per unit length  FFR"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0070"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"fractional flow reserve  hazard ratio  OR"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0090"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"odds ratio  PCI"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0100"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"percutaneous coronary intervention  %DS"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0110"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"percentage diameter stenosis  PPG"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0120"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"pull back pressure gradient  QCA"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0130"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"quantitative coronary angiography  QFR"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0140"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"quantitative flow ratio  TVF"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0150"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"target vessel failure
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号