A field study on the validity of the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique |
| |
Authors: | Mangan Daniel J Armitage Thomas E Adams Gregory C |
| |
Affiliation: | 8 Warren Way, Amherst, NH 03031, United States. |
| |
Abstract: | This field study tested and demonstrated the validity and reliability of the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique designed for specific Single-Issue Psychophysiological Veracity (PV) examinations using the polygraph, using one hundred and forty confirmed real-life cases from a private polygraph firm under contract with a metropolitan police department. The Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique's unique Inside Track accurately increased the scores for the innocent by 43.6% and the guilty by 37.1% thereby reducing the overall inconclusive rate from 19.5% to 1.4%, which effectively remedies the major cause (Fear/Hope of Error) of inconclusive results in single-issue polygraph tests. The Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique correctly identified 100% of the innocent as truthful with no inconclusives and no errors. It further correctly identified 97.8% of the guilty as deceptive and 2.2% as inconclusive, with no errors. Inconclusives excluded, the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique was 100% accurate in the identification of the innocent and the guilty. Inconclusives included, the utility rate was 98.6%. Blind scoring of polygraph charts showed extremely high correlations for the individual and total scores with a combined accuracy of 98.3%. |
| |
Keywords: | Polygraph Validity Test Examination Field study Accuracy Quadri-Track Matte Backster Zone comparison technique Zone comparison test Psychophysiological veracity Control question test Psychophysiological detection of deception Technique Deceptive Truthful Inconclusive Utility Inside Track Blind scoring |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |