首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A field study on the validity of the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique
Authors:Mangan Daniel J  Armitage Thomas E  Adams Gregory C
Affiliation:8 Warren Way, Amherst, NH 03031, United States.
Abstract:This field study tested and demonstrated the validity and reliability of the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique designed for specific Single-Issue Psychophysiological Veracity (PV) examinations using the polygraph, using one hundred and forty confirmed real-life cases from a private polygraph firm under contract with a metropolitan police department. The Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique's unique Inside Track accurately increased the scores for the innocent by 43.6% and the guilty by 37.1% thereby reducing the overall inconclusive rate from 19.5% to 1.4%, which effectively remedies the major cause (Fear/Hope of Error) of inconclusive results in single-issue polygraph tests. The Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique correctly identified 100% of the innocent as truthful with no inconclusives and no errors. It further correctly identified 97.8% of the guilty as deceptive and 2.2% as inconclusive, with no errors. Inconclusives excluded, the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique was 100% accurate in the identification of the innocent and the guilty. Inconclusives included, the utility rate was 98.6%. Blind scoring of polygraph charts showed extremely high correlations for the individual and total scores with a combined accuracy of 98.3%.
Keywords:Polygraph   Validity   Test   Examination   Field study   Accuracy   Quadri-Track   Matte   Backster   Zone comparison technique   Zone comparison test   Psychophysiological veracity   Control question test   Psychophysiological detection of deception   Technique   Deceptive   Truthful   Inconclusive   Utility   Inside Track   Blind scoring
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号