首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同麻醉方法对腹腔镜胆囊切除术围术期胃肠动力的影响
引用本文:廖琴,王明安,欧阳文,段开明,侯丽花. 不同麻醉方法对腹腔镜胆囊切除术围术期胃肠动力的影响[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2003, 28(1): 73-75
作者姓名:廖琴  王明安  欧阳文  段开明  侯丽花
作者单位:1. 中南大学湘雅三医院麻醉科,长沙,410013
2. 安仁县二医院麻醉科,郴州,423606
摘    要:目的 :比较不同的麻醉方法对腹腔镜胆囊切除术 (LC)患者围术期胃肠动力的影响。方法 :4 2例行LC患者随机分成硬膜外复合全身麻醉组 (A组 ) ,异丙酚全凭静脉麻醉组 (B组 ) ,异氟醚吸静复合全身麻醉组 (C组 ) ,每组14例。分时段监测血浆胃动素变化 ,观察术后 4 8h内恶心呕吐发生率及肛门首次排气时间 ,并记录术后住院日。结果 :① 3组病人胃动素术毕均较术前、术后 2 4h ,4 8h明显升高 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,术后 4 8h恢复到术前水平 ;其中C组术毕时胃动素明显高于A ,B两组 (P <0 .0 5 )。②术后 6h内恶心呕吐的发生率C组明显高于A ,B两组 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,术后6h后差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。③术后 3组病人肛门首次排气时间及术后住院日无明显差别 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :不同的麻醉方法不会影响LC手术围术期肛门首次排气时间的恢复及术后住院日的长短 ;硬膜外复合全麻及异丙酚全凭静脉麻醉术后的恶心呕吐发生率较低 ,是较理想的麻醉选择

关 键 词:麻醉   腹腔镜术   胃动素   恶心   呕吐  
文章编号:1000-5625(2003)01-0073-03
修稿时间:2002-07-25

Effect of different anesthesias on gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
LIAO Qin,WANG Ming an,OUYANG Wen,et al.. Effect of different anesthesias on gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2003, 28(1): 73-75
Authors:LIAO Qin  WANG Ming an  OUYANG Wen  et al.
Affiliation:(Department of Anesthesiology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of three different anesthesias on gastrointestinal motility after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods Forty two patients undergoing LC were randomly allocated to the combined epidural general anesthesia group (Group A,n=14), propofol based total intravenous anesthesia group (Group B, n=14) and isoflurane based inhalational intravenous general anesthesia group (Group C,n=14). The concentration of plasma motilin was measured; the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and the first flatus time were observed; and the in hospital day was recorded. Results ① The concentration of plasma motilin increased significantly during the first 1 h postoperatively (P<0.05), but it had no significant difference in the 48 h after operation (P>0.05) in comparison with the preoperative data in the three groups. The concentration of plasma motilin in Group C was much higher than that in the other two groups during the first 1 h postoperatively (P<0.05). ② The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was much higher in Group C than that in the other two groups during the first 6 h postoperatively (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the 6 h after operation in the three groups (P>0.05).③ The first flatus time and in hospital day postoperatively had no statistical difference in the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Different anesthesias do not influence the recovery of intestinal motion and in hospital day postoperatively; the combined epidural general anesthesia and propofol based total intravenous anesthesia may be ideal anesthesias because of the lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Keywords:anesthesia  laparoscopy  motilin  nausea  vomiting
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中南大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中南大学学报(医学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号