首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The readability of online Canadian radiotherapy patient educational materials
Institution:1. Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada;2. Department of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada;1. Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan;2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yotsukaidou Tokushukai Medical Center, Chiba 284-0032, Japan;1. Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;2. Department of Pathology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:Introduction/backgroundIt is not clear if online radiotherapy patient educational materials that are published by the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) and the various provincial health authorities meet the appropriate readability levels. The aim of this study is to determine the readability of online Canadian radiotherapy patient educational materials.MethodsThe publicly available educational materials were acquired from the provincial health authorities' and the CCS's websites. Only English language materials were included. Documents which mainly contained instructions or were part of interactive modules were excluded. The materials were transferred to Microsoft Word documents and labelled by source and category. Editing was then performed and the readability scores were acquired for each document.ResultsA total of 67 documents were included and 4 were excluded. The overall mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level from all sources was 7.5 (range, 3.6–13.2; 95% confidence interval CI] 7.1–7.9), while the overall mean Flesch Reading Ease from all sources was 64.0 (range, 44.2–78.1; 95% confidence interval CI] 62.0–66.1). The mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores from all sources were higher than the grade 6 recommended reading level for patient educational materials. This difference was found to be statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) for Alberta, New Brunswick, Quebec, and Nova Scotia.Discussion/conclusionsOverall, the readability levels of online Canadian radiotherapy patient educational materials exceed the recommended grade 6 readability for patient educational resources. It is hoped that the findings of this study would inform and guide the future development and distribution of materials that meet the appropriate readability standards.
Keywords:Health literacy  Canada  Radiotherapy  Patient education  Readability  CCS"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0040"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Canadian Cancer Society  AMA"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0050"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"American Medical Association  PDF"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0060"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Portable document format
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号