首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

基于ARIMA - SVM组合模型的道路交通伤害死亡率预测
引用本文:张帆,寻鲁宁,孙纪新,唐大镜,路笑颖,杨语嫣,崔泽.基于ARIMA - SVM组合模型的道路交通伤害死亡率预测[J].现代预防医学,2021,0(10):1742-1746.
作者姓名:张帆  寻鲁宁  孙纪新  唐大镜  路笑颖  杨语嫣  崔泽
作者单位:1.河北省疾病预防控制中心,河北 石家庄 050011;2.华北理工大学公共卫生学院
摘    要:目的 探讨ARIMA - SVM组合模型在道路交通伤害死亡率预测中的应用,并与单纯ARIMA模型的预测效果比较。方法 利用2014年1月-2018年6月河北省道路交通伤害死亡率数据拟合建立ARIMA模型和ARIMA - SVM组合模型,对2018年7-12月死亡率进行预测,并与实际死亡率进行验证比较,评价模型的预测效果。结果 ARIMA模型预测值与实际值的相对误差在0.00%~13.38%之间,ARIMA - SVM组合模型预测值与实际值的相对误差在0.00%~3.75%之间;且两者预测效果评价指标RMSE、MAE和MAPE分别为0.102、0.042,0.079、0.036,5.264%、2.469%。结论 ARIMA - SVM组合模型的预测效果优于单纯ARIMA模型,预测精度更高,可用于道路交通伤害死亡率的预测。

关 键 词:ARIMA  -  SVM组合模型  ARIMA模型  道路交通伤害  预测

Mortality prediction of road traffic injury based on ARIMA-SVM combination model
ZHANG Fan,XUN Lu-ning,SUN Ji-xin,TANG Da-jing,LU Xiao-ying,YANG Yu-yan,CUI Ze.Mortality prediction of road traffic injury based on ARIMA-SVM combination model[J].Modern Preventive Medicine,2021,0(10):1742-1746.
Authors:ZHANG Fan  XUN Lu-ning  SUN Ji-xin  TANG Da-jing  LU Xiao-ying  YANG Yu-yan  CUI Ze
Institution:*Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the application of autoregressive integrated moving average model(ARIMA-SVM) combination model to the prediction of road traffic injury mortality and compare the prediction effect with that of ARIMA model alone.Methods An ARIMA model and a combined ARIMA-SVM model were fitted using road traffic injury mortality data from January 2014 to June 2018 in Hebei Province to predict the mortality rate from July to December in 2018, and the prediction effects of the models were evaluated by comparison with the actual mortality rate. Results The relative errors between the predicted and actual values of the ARIMA model ranged from 0.00% to 13.38%, and the relative errors between the predicted and actual values of the combined ARIMA-SVM model ranged from 0.00% to 3.75%. The evaluation indexes of the prediction effects of both models, root mean square error(RMSE), mean absolute error(MAE) and mean absolute percentage error(MAPE) were 0.102 and 0.042, 0.079 and 0.036, 5.264% and 2.469%. Conclusion The combined ARIMASVM combination model has better prediction effect and higher prediction accuracy than the simple ARIMA model for road traffic injury mortality prediction.
Keywords:ARIMA-SVM combination model  ARIMA model  Road traffic injury  Prediction
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号