首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

针灸治疗强直性脊柱炎临床观察(英文)
引用本文:李莉,邓樱.针灸治疗强直性脊柱炎临床观察(英文)[J].针灸推拿医学(英文版),2012,10(5):318-320.
作者姓名:李莉  邓樱
作者单位:Acupuncture Department, Kunming Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yunnan 650011, China
摘    要:目的:比较不同针灸疗法治疗强直性脊柱炎的临床疗效差异。方法:将60例符合诊断标准的强直性脊柱炎患者随机分为观察组(30例)和对照组(30例)。观察组予温针疗法,对照组予电针治疗。治疗结束对两组进行疗效比较。结果:观察组治愈率为40.0%,总有效率为96.7%;对照组治愈率为10.0%,总有效率为76.7%。两组疗效比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:针灸治疗强直性脊柱炎时温针疗效明显优于电针。

关 键 词:针灸疗法  电针  温针疗法  脊椎炎  强直性

Clinical observation on acupuncture-moxibustion therapy in treating ankylosing spondylitis
Li Li , Deng Ying.Clinical observation on acupuncture-moxibustion therapy in treating ankylosing spondylitis[J].Journal of Acupuncture and Tuina Science,2012,10(5):318-320.
Authors:Li Li  Deng Ying
Institution:1. Acupuncture Department, Kunming Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yunnan, 650011, China
Abstract:

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of different acupuncture methods in treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods

Sixty patients in accordance with the diagnostic criteria for AS were randomly divided into an observation group (30 cases) and a control group (30 cases). Patients in the observation group were given warm needling therapy, while that in the control group were treated by electroacupuncture. The effects of the two groups were compared after treatment.

Results

The curative rate of the observation group was 40.0%, and the total effective rate was 96.7%; the curative rate of the control group was 10.0%, and the total effective rate was 76.7%. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

As to acupuncture treatment for AS, warming needling moxibustion was significantly more effective than electroacupuncture.
Keywords:Acupuncture-moxibustion Therapy  Electroacupuncture  Warm Needling Therapy  Spondylitis  Ankylosing
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号