| Abstract: | A group of 83 men and women who had been referred to Johns Hopkins Hospital for cardiac catheterization for evaluation of chest pain and possible coronary artery bypass surgery were assessed behaviorally for their chest pains. During the approximately 2-week period between clinical evaluation and catheterization, the patients completed self-report forms about their chest pains. Patients completed one form for each episode of chest pain. Referring physicians also completed a form about the patients "typical" chest pain. The data were analyzed in terms of the antecedents, concomitants, and consequences of the chest pain, and patients' reports were compared to physicians' judgments. Major findings were as follows: 1) Antecedents--most episodes occurred while the patient was at home at times when his mood was one of contentment. 2) Concomitants--the average patient reported fewer than one episode per day which persisted for about 4 min and was rated as 36 on a scale of 0 to 100. The most common physical symptoms accompanying the episode were breathlessness and weakness, and the most common pain sensations were reported to be pressing or aching. There was no consistency among patients either in primary location or path of radiation of the pain. Duration of pain did not correlate significantly either with sensation or symptoms; however, severity rating did correlate with symptoms and sensations. 3) Consequences--most episodes were self-treated with nitroglycerin or rest. Patients typically returned to their ongoing activities; however, there were a number of interactions between the likelihood of returning to ones ongoing activity and the antecedents of the episodes. 4) The referring physicians significantly overestimated the frequency and severity of their patients' episodes; furthermore, they were selective in their abilities to identify correctly the antecedents or concomitants associated with their patients' pain--e.g., they were reliable in their judgments about subjects who had sleep-related episodes; however, they were inaccurate in characterizing the typical sensations or symptoms reported by their patients. It is suggested that a behavioral analysis may enable a physician to characterize his patient's chest complaints better, and perhaps also may facilitate the differentiation between chest complaints indicative of coronary artery disease and chest complaints of a noncoronary origin. |
