首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

护理行为六维度量表中文版的信效度分析
引用本文:刘国云,杨辉. 护理行为六维度量表中文版的信效度分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2012, 18(20): 2373-2375
作者姓名:刘国云  杨辉
作者单位:刘国云 (102600,北京市仁和医院护理部) ; 杨辉 (山西医科大学第一医院护理部, 太原,030001) ;
摘    要:目的探讨护理行为六维度量表(6-D量表)中文版的信效度,检验其是否适合我国使用。方法采用探索性因素分析、重测信度、内在一致性信度和分半信度对6-D量表进行信度与效度检验。结果对中文版6-D量表进行探索性因子分析,提取了特征值大于1的公因子5个,其累积方差贡献率达到52.293%,内部一致性Cronbach’sα系数、分半系数分别为0.948,0.816,重测信度系数ICC为0.857;除了第8,13,30条目,中文版6-D量表几乎所有的条目在6个因子中都得到了较为充分的表达,均落入所归属的维度中。结论中文版6-D量表被验证具有较好的信效度,适用于我国文化背景下临床护士的能力测评。

关 键 词:护理评价研究  6-D量表  信度  效度

Reliability and validity analysis of six dimension scale of nursing performance
LIU Guo-yun,YANG Hui. Reliability and validity analysis of six dimension scale of nursing performance[J]. Modern Nursing, 2012, 18(20): 2373-2375
Authors:LIU Guo-yun  YANG Hui
Affiliation:. Department of Nursing, Beijing Renhe Hospital, Beijing 102600, China
Abstract:Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of 6-D scale of nursing performance, and examine whether it is suitable in China. Methods Exploratory factor analysis, test-retest reliability, internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability were used to examine the reliability and validity of the 6-D scale. Results Exploratory factor analysis of Chinese 6-D scale and 5 common factors whose eigenvalue was bigger than 1 showed that, the accumulative contribution rate was 52. 293% , the internal consistency coefficient Cronbach' s αwas 0. 948, half coefficient was 0. 816, and ICC test-retest reliability coefficient was 0. 857. Except for entry 8, 13 and 30, all other entries in Chinese 6-D scale were well expressed in 6 factors and fell in its dimension. Conclusions 6-D scale is verified with a good reliability and validity for evaluating nurses' clinical competence in China.
Keywords:Nursing evaluation research  6-D scale  Reliability  Validity
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号