The Quality of Reconstructed 3D Images in Multidetector-Row Helical CT: Experimental Study Involving Scan Parameters |
| |
Authors: | Ji Hoon Shin Ho Kyu Lee Choong Gon Choi Dae Chul Suh Tae-Hwan Lim Weechang Kang |
| |
Affiliation: | 1Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea.;2Department of Information and Statistics, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea. |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveTo determine which multidetector-row helical CT scanning technique provides the best-quality reconstructed 3D images, and to assess differences in image quality according to the levels of the scanning parameters used.Materials and MethodsFour objects with different surfaces and contours were scanned using multidetector-row helical CT at three detector-row collimations (1.25, 2.50, 5.00 mm), two pitches (3.0, 6.0), and three different degrees of overlap between the reconstructed slices (0%, 25%, 50%). Reconstructed 3D images of the resulting 72 sets of data were produced using volumetric rendering. The 72 images were graded on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each of four rating criteria, giving a mean score for each criterion and an overall mean score. Statistical analysis was used to assess differences in image quality according to scanning parameter levels.ResultsThe mean score for each rating criterion, and the overall mean score, varied significantly according to the scanning parameter levels used. With regard to detector-row collimation and pitch, all levels of scanning parameters gave rise to significant differences, while in the degree of overlap of reconstructed slices, there were significant differences between overlap of 0% and of 50% in all levels of scanning parameters, and between overlap of 25% and of 50% in overall accuracy and overall mean score. Among the 18 scanning sequences, the highest score (4.94) was achieved with 1.25 mm detector-row collimation, 3.0 pitch, and 50% overlap between reconstructed slices.ConclusionComparison of the quality of reconstructed 3D images obtained using multidetector-row helical CT and various scanning techniques indicated that the 1.25 mm, 3.0, 50% scanning sequence was best. Quality improved as detector-row collimation decreased; as pitch was reduced from 6.0 to 3.0; and as overlap between reconstructed slices increased. |
| |
Keywords: | Computed tomography (CT), helical Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional Computed tomography (CT), experimental study |
|
|