首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Retrospective Evaluation of Therapies for Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis
Authors:Chris A. Gentry Pharm.D.  Keith A. Rodvold Pharm.D.  Richard M. Novak M.D.  Ronald C. Hershow M.D.  Odin J. Naderer Pharm.D.
Affiliation:From the Departments of Pharmacy Practice (Drs. Gentry, Rodvold, and Naderer) and Infectious Diseases (Drs. Rodvold, Novak, and Hershow), Colleges of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract:We retrospectively evaluated antiinfective therapy for methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endocarditis in 54 patients who had 57 treatment courses for the disease. Three treatments were assessed: 27 nafcillin-treated courses of MSSA endocarditis, 18 vancomycin-treated courses of MSSA endocarditis, and 11 vancomycin-treated courses of MRSA endocarditis. At baseline, patients with MSSA treated with vancomycin had more chronic conditions (p<0.01), a lower frequency of intravenous drug use (p<0.01), a lower hematocrit concentration (p<0.05), and a higher serum creatinine concentration (p<0.05) than the nafcillin group. Vancomycin-treated patients had a higher complication rate during therapy (p<0.05) and a longer duration in an intensive care unit (p<0.01) than the nafcillin group. The trend was for a higher complete response rate in the nafcillin group (74% vs 50%, p=0.12), but no difference in mortality (22% vs 28%, p=0.73). Patients with MRSA infection treated with vancomycin had higher mortality than those with MSSA who received that drug (55% vs 28%, p=0.24). Patients with vancomycin-treated MSSA endocarditis may have a poorer outcome than those who receive nafcillin, but this may be influenced by different or more severe clinical features. (Pharmacotherapy 1997;17(5):990–997)
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号