| 人工鼻与加热湿化在护理用时中的对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 彭翠香,吕晓玲,向克兰,王青丽,张文俐,张满. 人工鼻与加热湿化在护理用时中的对比研究[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2010, 29(1): 487-489. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4351.2010.04.003 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 彭翠香 吕晓玲 向克兰 王青丽 张文俐 张满 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 三峡大学附属人民医院湖北省宜昌市第一人民医院ICU,宜昌市,443000; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 湖北省卫生厅2007～指导性科研项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | Objective To compare the difference of impact on the nursing time consuming between two types of artificial airway humidification, which means HME (heal and mositure exchanger) and HH (heated humidifier).Methods Use HME as experimental group and HH as control group, evaluate the effect of these two types of artificial airway humidification from sputum viscosity, formation of sputum callus, airway spasm and humidification accident, account, and analyze the data by statistic method. Results HME was much better than HH on effect of humidification. The experiment group spent (6.67±1.01 ) min on time consuming for nursing and the control group spent (26.27±1.75) min, the difference between two types of humidification was significant (P ＜ 0. 01) . By the way, HME was much better than HH on the frequency of sputum suction bedclothes replacement (P＜0.05).Conclusions The advantage of HME is decreasing the nursing manpower investment, through saving the time consuming for nursing, relieving strength of nurse work and improving efficacy of artificial airway management.
|
| 关 键 词： | 人工鼻 加热湿化 护理用时 |
Correlation research for HME and HH on the impact of nursing time consuming |
| |
| Abstract: | |
| |
| Keywords: | HME (heal and moisture exchanger)HH (heated humidifier)Nursing time consuming |
|
|
