首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Anaphylaxis in Latin America: a report of the online Latin American survey on anaphylaxis (OLASA)
Authors:Sole Dirceu,Ivancevich Juan Carlos,Borges Mario Sanchez,Coelho Magna Adaci,Rosario Nelson A,Ardusso Ledit Ramón Francisco,Bernd Luis Antônio Guerra  Latin American Anaphylaxis Working Group
Affiliation:9. Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.;99. Immunology, Medical School, Universidad del Salvador, Buenos Aires. Head of the Division of Allergy and Immunology, Clínica Santa Isabel, Buenos Aires.;999. Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Médico-Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, Venezuela. Head of Allergy and Immunology Department, Clínica El Avila, Caracas, Venezuela.;9V. Medicine, University of Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.;V. Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.;V9. Medical Pathology II (Pulmonology, Allergy and Immunology), Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Rosario, Argentina.;V99. Division of Immunology and Immunopathology, Federal Faculty Foundation of Medical Sciences of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Abstract:

OBJECTIVES:

The aims of the Online Latin American Survey of Anaphylaxis (OLASA) were to identify the main clinical manifestations, triggers, and treatments of severe allergic reactions in patients who were seen by allergists from July 2008 to June 2010 in 15 Latin American countries and Portugal (n = 634).

RESULTS:

Of all patients, 68.5% were older than 18 years, 41.6% were male, and 65.4% experienced the allergic reaction at home. The etiologic agent was identified in 87.4% of cases and predominantly consisted of drugs (31.2%), foods (23.3%), and insect stings (14.9%). The main symptom categories observed during the acute episodes were cutaneous (94.0%) and respiratory (79.0%). The majority of patients (71.6%) were treated initially by a physician (office/emergency room) within the first hour after the reaction occurred (60.2%), and 43.5% recovered in the first hour after treatment. Most patients were treated in an emergency setting, but only 37.3% received parenteral epinephrine alone or associated with other medication. However, 80.5% and 70.2% were treated with corticosteroids or antihistamines (alone or in association), respectively. A total of 12.9% of the patients underwent reanimation maneuvers, and 15.2% were hospitalized. Only 5.8% of the patients returned to the emergency room after discharge, with 21.7% returning in the first 6 hours after initial treatment.

CONCLUSION:

The main clinical manifestations of severe allergic reactions were cutaneous. The etiologic agents that were identified as causing these acute episodes differed according to age group. Following in order: drugs (31.2%), foods (23.3% and insect stings (14.9%) in adults with foods predominance in children. Treatment provided for acute anaphylactic reactions was not appropriate. It is necessary to improve educational programs in order to enhance the knowledge on this potentially fatal emergency.
Keywords:Anaphylaxis   Drugs   Food   Hymenoptera sp   Epinephrine
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号