Effect of dimethylnitrosamine‐induced liver dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics of 5‐fluorouracil after administration of S‐1, an antitumour drug,to rats |
| |
Authors: | Kunihiro Yoshisue Shohei Kanie Takako Nishimura Junko Chikamoto Sekio Nagayama |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Pharmacokinetics Research Laboratory, Tokushima Research Center, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokushima, Japan;2. Drug Safety Research Laboratory, Tokushima Research Center, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokushima, Japan;3. Personal Medicine Research Laboratory, Tokushima Research Center, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokushima, Japan |
| |
Abstract: | Objectives The anti‐tumour agent S‐1 comprises tegafur (a prodrug of 5‐fluorouracil; 5‐FU), gimeracil (2‐chloro‐2,4‐dihydroxypyridine (CDHP); a competitive inhibitor of 5‐FU metabolism) and oteracil potassium. The effect of hepatic dysfunction induced by dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) on the pharmacokinetics of 5‐FU after administration of S‐1 to rats was investigated. Methods S‐1 (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously and orally to rats with DMN‐induced liver dysfunction. Plasma concentrations of S‐1 components and 5‐FU were measured by HPLC and LC/MS‐MS. Blood tests and in‐vitro enzymatic investigations were also conducted. Key findings DMN treatment induced hepatic dysfunction and decreased the conversion of tegafur to 5‐FU in the liver without altering renal function or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. Following intravenous administration of S‐1, the blood concentration‐time profiles of CDHP were similar between control rats and rats with hepatic dysfunction, but the half‐life of tegafur was significantly prolonged. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 5‐FU was significantly reduced and the area under the blood concentration‐time curve (AUC) was reduced by 22%. Following oral administration, the Cmax of tegafur, 5‐FU and CDHP were significantly decreased and half‐lives significantly increased. Hepatic dysfunction had a less pronounced effect on the AUC of 5‐FU (13.6% reduction). Conclusions The pharmacokinetic profiles of tegafur, 5‐FU and CDHP were altered by changes in the elimination rate of tegafur induced by a decrease in the conversion of tegafur to 5‐FU. However, hepatic dysfunction had less of an effect on the AUC of 5‐FU, which correlates with anti‐tumour effect, after the oral administration of S‐1. |
| |
Keywords: | 5‐FU dimethylnitrosamine hepatic dysfunction pharmacokinetics S‐1 |
|
|