Screening for Psychological Distress in Surgical Breast Cancer Patients |
| |
Authors: | Jane R. Schubart PhD MS MBA Matthew Emerich BS Michelle Farnan RN MSN OCN J. Stanley Smith MD Gordon L. Kauffman MD Rena B. Kass MD |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Surgery, Medicine and Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA 2. College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA 3. Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA 4. Department of Surgery and Medicine, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | Background This pilot study assessed the levels of patient emotional distress and impact on clinic throughput time. Methods From April through August 2012, 149 breast cancer patients at the Penn State Hershey Breast Center were screened with the emotions thermometer (ET), a patient-rated visual 0–10 scale that measures distress, anxiety, depression, anger, burden, and need for help. Also, patients indicated their most pressing cancer-related concerns. Clinic visit time was computed and compared with a control group. Results Using a previously validated cut point ≥4 for any thermometer, we found emotional difficulty in the following proportions: distress 22 %, anxiety 28 %, depression 18 %, anger 14 %, burden 16 %, and need for help 10 %; 35 % scored above the cut point on at least 1 thermometer. We found higher levels of distress in all domains associated with younger age at diagnosis. More extensive surgery (bilateral mastectomy vs unilateral mastectomy vs. lumpectomy) was correlated with higher levels of psychosocial distress. Most often cited concerns, experienced by >20 %, included eating/weight, worry about cancer, sleep problems, fatigue, anxiety, and pain. Mean clinic visit time for evaluable patients screened using the ET (n = 109) was 43.9 min (SD 18.6), compared with 42.6 min (SD 16.2) for the control group (n = 50). Conclusions Utilizing the ET, more than one-third of women screened met criteria for psychological distress. Younger age at diagnosis and more extensive surgery were risk factors. The ET is a simple validated screening tool that identifies patients in need of further psychological evaluation without impacting clinic throughput time. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|