吴普所引神农药性与《证类》“本经药”所引神农药性同异考

通过《吴普本草》、《证类本草》所载“神农药性”勘比分析,揭示出中国本草文献上几个问题。一、《证类本草》“本经药”的药性是不全的,缺少“有毒、无毒”内容。二、古代《本草经》不是一种本子,而是多种本子。其载药数不仅有３６５种,还有５９５、４４１、３１９种。三、所谓“本经药”、“别录药”也不是固定的,有些药在某些《本草经》中,定为“本经药”,但在《证类本草》类中又定为“别录药”。

Study on the difference between Shennong's drug nature quoted by Wu Puu and by Shennong's drug in material medical in classified syndromes (Zheng)

Several questions were mentioned through the analysis and comparison of "Shennong's drug nature" (DN) as quoted by Wu Pu's Meteria Madica (WP) and Materia Medica of Classified Syndrome (Zheng) (ZL). These include: (1) The DN in ZL are incomplete, the "toxic nontoxic" terms were absent here; (2) There were different editions of ancient "Shennong's Canon of Materia Medica", carrying different numbers of drugs, including 365 kinds, 595, 441, 319 kinds respectively; (3) some of the drugs indicated as DN were, strangely, indicated as "drugs of supplemented Records" in ZL.