首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Distinct pathological subtypes of FTLD-FUS
Authors:Ian R. A. Mackenzie  David G. Munoz  Hirofumi Kusaka  Osamu Yokota  Kenji Ishihara  Sigrun Roeber  Hans A. Kretzschmar  Nigel J. Cairns  Manuela Neumann
Affiliation:(1) Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada;(2) Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, St., Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada;(3) Department of Neurology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan;(4) Department of Neuropsychiatry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan;(5) Department of Neurology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan;(6) Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany;(7) Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA;(8) Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract:Most cases of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are characterized by abnormal intracellular accumulation of either tau or TDP-43 protein. However, in ~10% of cases, composed of a heterogenous collection of uncommon disorders, the molecular basis remains to be uncertain. We recently discovered that the pathological changes in several tau/TDP-43-negative FTLD subtypes are immunoreactive (ir) for the fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein. In this study, we directly compared the pattern of FUS-ir pathology in cases of atypical FTLD-U (aFTLD-U, N = 10), neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease (NIFID, N = 5) and basophilic inclusion body disease (BIBD, N = 8), to determine whether these are discrete entities or represent a pathological continuum. All cases had FUS-ir pathology in the cerebral neocortex, hippocampus and a similar wide range of subcortical regions. Although there was significant overlap, each group showed specific differences that distinguished them from the others. Cases of aFTLD-U consistently had less pathology in subcortical regions. In addition, the neuronal inclusions in aFTLD-U usually had a uniform, round shape, whereas NIFID and BIBD were characterized by a variety of inclusion morphologies. In all cases of aFTLD-U and NIFID, vermiform neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NII) were readily identified in the hippocampus and neocortex. In contrast, only two cases of BIBD had very rare NII in a single subcortical region. These findings support aFTLD-U, NIFID and BIBD as representing closely related, but distinct entities that share a common molecular pathogenesis. Although cases with overlapping pathology may exist, we recommend retaining the terms aFTLD-U, NIFID and BIBD for specific FTLD-FUS subtypes.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号