首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

情绪障碍对ACS患者NLR水平和GRACE评分危险分层的影响
引用本文:刘燕霞,刘相丽.情绪障碍对ACS患者NLR水平和GRACE评分危险分层的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,0(3):267-270.
作者姓名:刘燕霞  刘相丽
作者单位:(天津医科大学第二医院心脏科,天津300211)
摘    要:目的:研究情绪障碍对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者自身炎症反应及病情严重程度的影响。方法:收集190例ACS患者的临床资料,采用GRACE评分标准对所有患者进行危险分层。所有入选患者住院期间接受ACS标准化治疗,患者出院前7 d内完成患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)和广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7)以评估患者情绪状态,分析情绪障碍对患者炎症指标中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)及GRACE评分危险分层的影响。结果:(1)ACS患者中有抑郁障碍者占34.2%(65例),焦虑障碍者占28.9%(55例),其中抑郁合并焦虑者占9.5%(18例)。(2)GRACE危险分层高危组PHQ-9评分、GAD-7评分及NLR水平均高于中危组和低危组(9.10±4.13 vs. 7.29±3.79 vs. 5.90±4.27,9.51±3.77 vs. 7.83±4.79 vs. 4.98±4.55,4.61±5.38 vs. 3.72±2.47 vs. 2.86±1.92,P<0.05),有抑郁、焦虑症状组GRACE评分、NLR水平均高于无抑郁、焦虑症状组(119.89±30.20 vs.98.00±23.49,121.43±28.46 vs. 97.96±24.65,4.51±4.75 vs.3.25±2.54,4.62±5.27 vs. 3.23±2.03,P <0.01)。(3)以GRACE评分为因变量行多因素回归分析显示,PHQ-9评分、GAD-7评分及NLR水平与GRACE评分呈正相关关系。结论:情绪障碍可使ACS患者炎症反应指标NLR升高,病情加重,及时发现ACS患者情绪障碍及关注NLR水平可优化患者预后评估。

关 键 词:急性冠脉综合征  抑郁  焦虑  NLR  GRACE评分

Effects of mood disorders on NLR and risk stratification of GRACE scores in ACS patients
LIU Yan-xia,LIU Xiang-li.Effects of mood disorders on NLR and risk stratification of GRACE scores in ACS patients[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2019,0(3):267-270.
Authors:LIU Yan-xia  LIU Xiang-li
Institution:(Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China)
Abstract:Objective: To study the effects of mood disorders on the inflammatory response and severity of acute coronary syndrome. Methods: Clinical data of 190 patients with ACS were collected and risk assessment and risk stratification were conducted for all patients with GRACE score. All selected patients received ACS routine treatment, patients were discharged from hospital within 7 days before completing patient health questionnaire(PHQ-9) and anxiety scale(GAD-7)in the evaluation of patients’ emotional state, mood disorder, and whether NLR and GRACE score is related to the risk stratification was generalized. Results:(1)The proportion of patients with depressive disorder were 34.2%(65 cases), 28.9%(55 cases) and 9.5%(18 cases) with depression and anxiety.(2)The levels of PHQ-9, GAD-7 and NLR in the high-risk groups of parliamentary GRACE hazard stratification were higher than those in the middle and low risk groups(9.10±4.13 vs. 7.29±3.79 vs. 5.90±4.27, 9.51±3.77 vs. 7.83±4.79 vs. 4.98±4.55,4.61±5.38 vs. 3.72±2.47 vs. 2.86±1.92, P <0.05),and GRACE scores and NLR levels in the emotionally impaired group were higher than those in the non-mood disorder group(119.89±30.20 vs. 98.00±23.49, 121.43±28.46 vs. 97.96±24.65, 4.51±4.75 vs. 3.25±2.54, 4.62±5.27 vs. 3.23±2.03, P <0.01).(3)Multivariate regression analysis with GRACE score as the dependent variable showed that phq-9 score, GAD-7 score and NLR level were positively correlated with GRACE score. Conclusion: Emotional disorder, NLR and GRACE score of ACS patients are correlated. Timely detection of emotional disorder of ACS patients and attention to NLR level may optimize prognosis assessment of patients.
Keywords:acute coronary syndrome  depression  anxiety  NLR  GRACE scores
点击此处可从《天津医科大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《天津医科大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号