首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

直肠腔内超声与相控阵线圈磁共振在直肠癌术前局部分期中的Meta分析
引用本文:蔡 彬1,黄 伟1,储正达1,周敏红2,李春伟1. 直肠腔内超声与相控阵线圈磁共振在直肠癌术前局部分期中的Meta分析[J]. 医学信息, 2019, 0(10): 70-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.024
作者姓名:蔡 彬1  黄 伟1  储正达1  周敏红2  李春伟1
作者单位:(南京中医药大学无锡附属医院肛肠科1,消化科2,江苏 无锡 214000)
摘    要:目的 运用Meta分析比较直肠腔内超声(ERUS)与相控阵线圈磁共振(MRI)对直肠癌术前局部分期的准确率。方法 检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、OVID、Web of Science和CNKI电子数据库确定ERUS和相控阵线圈MRI对直肠癌术前局部分期准确率的相关临床随机对照研究,建库时间更新至2019年1月。使用STATA 12.0和RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析,使用Bgger's检验方法检测发表偏倚。结果 共纳入7项研究,发表年限为2005年~2014年,中国3篇,意大利2篇,土耳其1篇,西班牙1篇,共纳入416例患者。Meta分析结果显示,ERUS与相控阵线圈MRI对直肠癌术前T分期的准确率比较,差异无统计学意义(OR=0.91,95%CI:0.63~1.32,P=0.619)。对于直肠癌术前N分期,相控阵线圈MRI的准确率高于ERUS,差异有统计学意义(OR=0.58,95%CI:0.41~0.82,P=0.002)。Bgger's检验结果提示纳入研究无发表偏倚(Pr>|z|=0.453;P>0.05)。结论 通过Meta分析发现在直肠癌术前T分期,ERUS与相控阵线圈MRI的准确率相近,而在直肠癌术前N分期,相控阵线圈MRI相对于ERUS具有更高的准确率。

关 键 词:超声  磁共振成像  直肠癌  肿瘤分期  Meta分析

Meta-analysis of Intra-rectal Ultrasound and Phased-array Magnetic Resonance in the Preoperative Partial Phase of Rectal Cancer
CAI Bin1,HUANG Wei1,CHU Zheng-da1,ZHOU Min-hong2,LI Chun-wei1. Meta-analysis of Intra-rectal Ultrasound and Phased-array Magnetic Resonance in the Preoperative Partial Phase of Rectal Cancer[J]. Medical Information, 2019, 0(10): 70-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.024
Authors:CAI Bin1  HUANG Wei1  CHU Zheng-da1  ZHOU Min-hong2  LI Chun-wei1
Affiliation:(Department of Anorectal Surgery1,Department of Gastroenterology2,Wuxi Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Wuxi 214000,Jiangxi,China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the accuracy of intra-rectal ultrasound (ERUS) and phased-array magnetic resonance (MRI) in the preoperative partial phase of rectal cancer with meta-analysis.Methods The PubMed, Cochrane Library, OVID, Web of Science, and CNKI electronic databases were used to determine the clinical randomized controlled trials of ERUS and phased-array coil MRI for preoperative partial accuracy of rectal cancer. The database was updated to January 2019. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 12.0 and RevMan 5.3 software, and publication bias was detected using Bgger's test method. Results A total of 7 studies were included, with a publication period of 2005 to 2014, 3 in China, 2 in Italy, 1 in Turkey, and 1 in Spain. A total of 416 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the accuracy of ERUS and phased-array coil MRI for preoperative T staging of rectal cancer was not statistically significant (OR=0.91,95%CI:0.63~1.32,P=0.619).For preoperative N staging of rectal cancer, the accuracy of phased array coil MRI was higher than that of ERUS, and the difference was statistically significant (OR=0.58,95%CI:0.41~0.82,P=0.002).Bgger's test results suggest that there is no publication bias in the included study (Pr>|z|=0.453;P>0.05).Conclusion Meta-analysis found that the preoperative T stage of rectal cancer, ERUS and phased array coil MRI accuracy is similar, and in the preoperative N stage of rectal cancer, phased array coil MRI has higher accuracy than ERUS.
Keywords:Ultrasound  Magnetic resonance imaging  Rectal cancer  Tumor staging  Meta-analysis
点击此处可从《医学信息》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医学信息》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号