| Abstract: | SUMMARY. The use of audio and videotape recordings in supervision of dynamic psychotherapy is controversial. Recordings give direct, factually correct access to the therapy session which cannot be matched by the common, indirect method in supervision of recollection. The arguments for and against taping are presented and the conclusion is reached that tapes are an essential aid in supervision. They facilitate the close examination of process and technique. Discrepancies between the recollected account and the record are highlighted, not with the purpose of showing up the deficiencies of the therapist but as phenomena that have meaning and significance. How the therapist deals with transference and emotionally-charged issues can be seen and discussed. Perhaps their greatest value is in private review by the therapist. The meaning of being taped needs to be carefully considered and monitored by the therapist. Taping should be used selectively and sensitively. Careful attention needs to be given to consent, confidentiality and the security of the tapes. Advice is given on how to make recordings. Tapes may also be used in teaching, research and clinical audit. |
