首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Novel composite implant in craniofacial bone reconstruction
Authors:Matti?J.?Peltola  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:matti.peltola@tyks.fi"   title="  matti.peltola@tyks.fi"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Pekka?K.?Vallittu,Ville?Vuorinen,Allan?A.?J.?Aho,Antti?Puntala,Kalle?M.?J.?Aitasalo
Affiliation:(1) Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, P.O. BOX 52, 20521 Turku, Finland;(2) Department of Biomaterials Science, Institute of Dentistry, BioCity Turku Biomaterials Research Program, University of Turku, Turku, Finland;(3) Department of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland;(4) Department of Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Abstract:Bioactive glass (BAG) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) have been used in clinical applications. Antimicrobial BAG has the ability to attach chemically to surrounding bone, but it is not possible to bend, drill or shape BAG during the operation. PMMA has advantages in terms of shaping during the operation, but it does not attach chemically to the bone and is an exothermic material. To increase the usefulness of BAG and PMMA in skull bone defect reconstructions, a new composite implant containing BAG and PMMA in craniofacial reconstructions is presented. Three patients had pre-existing large defects in the calvarial and one in the midface area. An additive manufacturing (AM) model was used preoperatively for treatment planning and custom-made implant production. The trunk of the PMMA implant was coated with BAG granules. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed postoperatively at 1 week, and 3, 6 and 12 months, and thereafter annually up to 5 years. Computer tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET-CT) were performed at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Uneventful clinical recovery with good esthetic and functional outcome was seen. CT and PET-CT findings supported good clinical outcome. The BAG–PMMA implant seems to be a promising craniofacial reconstruction alternative. However, more clinical experience is needed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号