Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis |
| |
Authors: | Caussin Christophe Larchez Christophe Ghostine Saïd Pesenti-Rossi David Daoud Béatrice Habis Michel Sigal-Cinqualbre Anne Perrier Eric Angel Claude-Yves Lancelin Bernard Paul Jean-François |
| |
Institution: | Department of Cardiology, H?pital Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France. c.caussin@wanadoo.fr |
| |
Abstract: | The present study assessed 64-slice computed tomographic accuracy to quantify minimal lumen area (MLA) and determine lesion severity in intermediate stenosis by angiography compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Sixty-four-slice computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be effective in coronary stenotic assessment by visual estimation compared with angiography. However, angiography is not an accurate gold standard for intermediate stenotic quantification compared with IVUS. Forty patients (54 lesions) with 30% to 70% coronary stenosis by angiography in a major coronary branch were included. All patients underwent quantitative angiography, retrospective electrocardiographically gated 64-slice CT (Siemens), and IVUS (40-MHz Atlantis; Boston Scientific). MLA was manually traced by 2 blinded and independent operators on 64-slice computed tomographic cross-sectional reconstruction and compared with IVUS MLA. A lesion was considered significant if the MLA was
|
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |