首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

高血压患者治疗后血压昼夜节律及影响因素的调查
引用本文:邱原刚,姚雪艳,陶谦民,郑萍,陈君柱,朱建华,张芙荣,郑良荣,赵莉莉.高血压患者治疗后血压昼夜节律及影响因素的调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2004,25(8):710-714.
作者姓名:邱原刚  姚雪艳  陶谦民  郑萍  陈君柱  朱建华  张芙荣  郑良荣  赵莉莉
作者单位:1. 310003,杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院心内科
2. 浙江医学高等专科学校信息中心
基金项目:浙江省科技攻关基金(2004C33025),浙江省教育厅科学研究基金(20020825)
摘    要:目的了解高血压病患者经治疗血压达标后血压昼夜节律及影响因素.方法采用横断面调查的方法,采用进入法进行非条件logistic回归分析.结果共纳人208例患者,呈勺型曲线者79例(占38%),非勺型曲线者129例(占62%).logistic回归分析显示,年龄在70岁以上及60~69之间者24 h动态血压曲线呈非勺型的比例分别是60岁以下者的3.3倍(P=0.009)和2.3倍(P=0.031);有早发心血管疾病家族史的患者,其动态血压曲线形态呈非勺型的比例为无相应家族史患者的3.7倍(P=0.029);超重(BMI<28)与肥胖(BMI≥28)者24 h动态血压曲线呈非勺型的比例分别是正常体重(BMI<24)者的3.0倍(P=0.003)和4.8倍(P=0.009);与单独应用长效钙离子拮抗剂(CCBs)治疗相比,单用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)或血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARBs)治疗者动态血压曲线呈非勺型的机会较少(OR=0.139,P=0.010),采用包含ACEIs或ARBs(但不包括利尿剂)的联合用药方案的患者有较少非勺型曲线的趋势,但二组之间差异无显著性(OR=0.453,P=0.118);采用包括利尿剂(但无ACEIs或ARBs)的联合用药方案以及同时包含利尿剂与ACEIs或ARBs的联合用药方案的患者均有较少非勺型曲线的机会(OR值分别为0.378和0.273,P值分别为0.030和0.011).结论高血压患者经治疗血压达标后,有近三分之二的患者呈异常的血压昼夜节律.年龄、早发心血管疾病的家族史、超重或肥胖、降压药物治疗方案等4个因素与24 h血压曲线形态有关.与单用长效CCBs比较,利尿剂、ACEIs或ARBs可能有利于保持正常的血压昼夜节律.

关 键 词:高血压  原发性  血压监测  动态  昼夜节律
收稿时间:2003/5/8 0:00:00
修稿时间:2003年5月8日

Profile on circadian blood pressure and the influencing factors in essential hypertensive patients after treatment
Qiu Yuangang,Yao Xueyan,Tao Qianmin,Zheng Ping,Chen Junzhu,Zhu Jianhu,Zhang Furong,Zhegn Liangrong and Zhao Lili.Profile on circadian blood pressure and the influencing factors in essential hypertensive patients after treatment[J].Chinese Journal of Epidemiology,2004,25(8):710-714.
Authors:Qiu Yuangang  Yao Xueyan  Tao Qianmin  Zheng Ping  Chen Junzhu  Zhu Jianhu  Zhang Furong  Zhegn Liangrong and Zhao Lili
Institution:Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To explore the circadian blood pressure (BP) profile and its influencing factors in essential hypertensive patients after treatment. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveillance was carried out in essential hypertensive subjects after treatment whose clinic blood pressure had been under control as 140/90 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) for at least one month. All patients underwent a twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device (spacelabs 90207). The nocturnal fall of blood pressure (BP) was calculated from (daytime mean BP-night-time mean BP)/daytime BP, while 'daytime' values were recorded between 6 h and 22 h and 'night-time' values between 22 h and 6 h. Non-dippers were defined as those whose nocturnal decrease in mean systolic BP and/or mean diastolic BP was < 10% of the daytime BP. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between circadian blood pressure profile and factors as gender, age, height, body mass index (BMI), family history of premature cardiovascular disease, women under age 65 or men under age 55, smoking habits, grade of hypertension, and strategy of antihypertensive drugs. RESULTS: 208 treated essential hypertensive patients were enrolled in the study. 79 individuals were dippers and 129 were non-dippers. Data from logistic regression analysis showed that four factors as age, premature family history of cardiovascular disease, overweight or obesity, and strategy of antihypertensive drugs were significantly influencing the circadian blood pressure profile in treated hypertensive patients. The incidence of non-dippers in patients of 70 years of age or older and those between 60 and 69 were 3.3 and 2.3 times of those with less than 60 (P = 0.009 and 0.031, respectively). The prevalence of non-dippers in patients with a premature family history of cardiovascular disease was 3.7 times greater than those in subjects without a premature history of cardiovascular disease (P = 0.029). Similarly, the incidence of non-dippers in patients of overweight (24 /= 28) were 3.0 and 4.8 times of those in subjects of normal weight (P = 0.003 and 0.009, respectively). Compared with patients treated with long-acting calcium channel blockers (CCBs), patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) alone had less prevalence of nondippers (OR = 0.139, P = 0.010). Patients treated with joint antihypertensive scheme including ACE inhibitors or ARBs(but not including diuretics) had the tendency of lower incidence of abnormal circadian blood pressure rhythm (OR = 0.453, P = 0.118). Patients treated with joint antihypertensive scheme including diuretics (not including ACE inhibitors or ARBs) and with joint antihypertensive strategy including diuretics and ACE inhibitors or ARBs had lower incidence of nondippers (OR = 0.378 and 0.273, respectively; P = 0.030 and 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 2/3 treated essential hypertensive patients had a non-dipper blood pressure profile. Age, premature family history of cardiovascular disease, overweight/obesity, and antihypertensive drugs strategy were correlated with circadian blood pressure profile. Compared with long-acting CCBs, diuretics, ACE inhibitors or ARBs might be helpful in keeping the circadian blood pressure rhythm at normal range.
Keywords:Hypertension  essential  Blood pressure monitoring  ambulatory  Circadian rhythm
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号