Connor-Davidson心理复原力量表中文版在大学生中的信效度分析

目的考察心理复原力量表（Connor—DavidsonResilienceScale，CD—RISC）中文版在大学生中的信效度。方法对1610名大学生进行CD—RISC问卷调查，其中783人加测大五人格问卷（BFI）和症状自评量表（SCL．90）问卷，选取83名大学生初测3周后进行CD．RISC再测。结果（1）验证性因素分析表明三因素模型具有良好的匹配性（x。／d厂=6．632、RMSEA=0．059、GFI=0．934、AGFI=0．915、CFI=0．927、NFI=0．915）。（2）总量表及顺应性、坚韧性、自主性因子的Cronabach仪系数依次为0．914，0．865，0．784，0．767，项目间平均相关系数依次为0．364，0．417，0．425，0．398，Guttman分半信度系数依次为0．888，0．843，0．707，0．650，重测信度系数依次为0．856，0．742，0．777，0．747。（3）CD—RISC总量表及各因子分与BFI大五人格、SCL-90各项因子分的相关性均具有统计学意义（P〈0．01），不同复原力得分组间的BFI、SCL-90各项得分差异均具统计学意义（P〈0．01）。（4）不同性别大学生在总量表、坚韧性、自主性上的得分差异具有统计学意义男性：（2．77±0．60）分、（2．70±0．74）分、（2．65±0．68）分；女性：（2．70±0．53）分、（2．62±0．67）分、（2．54±0．62）分；P〈0．05]。结论CD—RISC中文版具有合适的信效度，可以在大学生群体研究中采用。

Reliability and validity of Connor-Davidson resilience scale in Chinese college students

Objective To examine the reliability and validity of Chinese revision of connor-davidson resil- ience scale（CD-RISC） in Chinese college students.Methods 1610 college students were tested with CD-RISC. 783 of them took a more test by BFI and SCL-90 at the same time.After three weeks,83 students were retested by CD-RISC.Results （ 1 ） The results of confirmatory factor analysis （ X2/df = 6.632, RMSEA = 0.059, GFI = 0. 934, AGFI = 0.915, CFI = 0.927, NFI = 0.915 ） indicated that the three-factor modal reasonably fitted Chinese col- lege students. （2） The Cronabaeh α coefficients of the CD-RISC and three factors called adaptability,tenacity and autonomy were 0.914,0.865,0.784,0.767 respectively; the mean inter-item correlation coefficients of them were 0. 364,0.417,0.425,0.398 respectively; the Guttman split-half coefficients were 0.888,0.843,0.707,0.650 respec- tively; the retest-reliability coefficients were 0.856,0.742,0.777,0.747. （ 3 ） The scores of the total scale of CD- RISC and three factors were significantly correlated to BFI and SCL-90（P〈0.01 ）. There were significant differences between the low-resilient group and the high-resilient group in every index of BFI and SCL-90. （4） There were sig- nificant differences between male and female students in CD-RISC and factor tenacity and autonomy（male：2.77±0.60,2.70±0. 74,2.65±0.68;female：2.70±0.53,2.62±0.67,2.54±0.62; P〈0.05） .Condusion The Chinese version of CD-RISC is a reliable and valid method for assessing resilience in Chinese college students.