Comparison of extracapsular pseudotumors seen in magnetic resonance imaging and in revision surgery of 167 failed metal-on-metal hip replacements

Background and purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important for detecting extracapsular pseudotumors, but there is little information on the accuracy of MRI and appropriate intervals for repeated imaging. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting pseudotumors in 155 patients (167 hips) with metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties that failed due to adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD).

Methods

Preoperative MRIs were performed with two 1.5 T MRI scanners and graded by a senior musculoskeletal radiologist using a previously described MRI pseudotumor grading system. Revision findings were retrieved from surgical notes, and pseudotumors were retrospectively graded as fluid-filled, mixed-type, or solid.

Results

The sensitivity of MRI was 71% and the specificity was 87% for detecting extracapsular pseudotumors. The sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 70–96) when MRI was performed less than 3 months before the revision surgery. Interestingly, when the time that elapsed between MRI and revision was more than 1 year, the sensitivity calculated was only 29% (95% CI: 14–56). Comparison between MRI and revision classifications gave moderate agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.4).

Interpretation

A recent MRI predicts the presence of a pseudotumor well, but there is more discrepancy when the MRI examination is over a year old, most likely due to the formation of new pseudotumors. 1 year could be a justifiable limit for considering a new MRI if development of ARMD is suspected. MRI images over a year old should not be used in decision making or in planning of revision surgery for MoM hips.Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements have been widely used for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis, particularly in young and active patients (Bozic et al. 2009). During the last few years, an increased risk of developing soft tissue reactions linked to increased wear of MoM articulation has been reported (Pandit et al. 2008, Kwon et al. 2010, Langton et al. 2011). An umbrella term “adverse reaction to metal debris” (ARMD) has been used to describe these tissue reactions, which include metallosis, aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis-associated lesions, and the fluid-filled or solid extracapsular lesions often referred to as pseudotumors (Langton et al. 2011). Most patients have high blood metal ions and many experience pain in the groin and thigh region, but ARMD may also be found in patients presenting with no clinical symptoms and normal whole-blood metal ion levels (Hart et al. 2011, Wynn-Jones et al. 2011). Asymptomatic extracapsular pseudotumors have been reported to increase and decrease in size with occasional remission of small masses, and they may involve the abductor and iliopsoas muscles (Almousa et al. 2013). Revision surgeries because of pseudotumors have been reported to have significantly poorer outcome than hip revisions for other reasons (Grammatopolous et al. 2009). Imaging is therefore needed to identify these patients for closer follow-up or revision surgery. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also of importance for surgeons to visualize the location and dimensions of the pseudotumor for optimal resection (Liddle et al. 2013).MRI and ultrasonography are the main imaging modalities for assessment of ARMD lesions. Modern MRI techniques allow good visibility in the hip region, even though intracapsular lesions cannot be reliably assessed in some cases due to metal artifacts. To our knowledge, only 1 study has compared pseudotumors seen in MRI with those actually found in revision surgery (Liddle et al. 2013).The main aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of preoperative MRI to detect extracapsular pseudotumors encountered in revision surgery and to assess appropriate intervals for repeated imaging, when development/progression of soft tissue pathologies is suspected. A secondary aim was to ascertain whether pseudotumors fall into the same categories in both MRI and revision surgery classifications.