首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Response to antiplatelet therapy is independent of endogenous thrombin generation potential
Authors:Thomas Gremmel  Simon Panzer  Sabine Steiner  Daniela Seidinger  Renate Koppensteiner  Ingrid Pabinger  Christoph W. Kopp  Cihan Ay
Affiliation:1. Division of Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria;2. Department for Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria;3. Clinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Abstract:

Background

Thrombin is the most potent platelet activator, and achieves rapid platelet activation even in the presence of antiplatelet therapy. Since activated platelets respond stronger to additional stimuli, the extent of endogenous thrombin generation may in part be responsible for the reported response variability to aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

Patients and methods

Thrombin generation potential was measured with a commercially available assay, and platelet reactivity was assessed with the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow aspirin and P2Y12 assays, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 316 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing angioplasty and stenting.

Results

Peak thrombin, the lag phase and the area under the curve of thrombin generation correlated poorly with on-treatment platelet reactivity by all test systems. High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to arachidonic acid was seen in 33 (10.5%), 41 (13%), and 79 (25.7%) patients by LTA, the VerifyNow aspirin assay, and MEA, respectively. HRPR in response to adenosine diphosphate was seen in 150 (48.1%), 48 (15.3%), 106 (33.7%), and 118 (38.3%) patients by the VASP assay, LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, and MEA, respectively. Peak thrombin generation did not differ between patients without and with HRPR by the VASP assay, LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and MEA. In the VerifyNow aspirin assay, patients without HRPR had higher peak thrombin generation than patients with HRPR (p = 0.01). Finally, patients without and with high peak thrombin generation exhibited similar on-treatment platelet reactivity by all test systems, and high peak thrombin generation occurred to a similar extent in patients without and with HRPR.

Conclusion

Response to antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is not associated with thrombin generation potential.
Keywords:AA, arachidonic acid   ADP, adenosine diphosphate   HRPR AA, high on-treatment residual AA inducible platelet reactivity   HRPR ADP, high on-treatment residual ADP inducible platelet reactivity   PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention   PAR, protease-activated receptor   VTE, venous thromboembolism   VASP, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein   LTA, light transmission aggregometry   MEA, multiple electrode platelet aggregometry   PRI, platelet reactivity index   MFI, mean fluorescence intensity   ARU, aspirin reaction units   PRU, P2Y12 Reaction Units   AU, aggregation units   AUC, area under the curve   ACS, acute coronary syndrome
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号